Following the rapid development of the entertainment industry and public figures’ popularity, information about what celebrities eat, wear or like is sought with great attention. Accordingly, a heated debate is provoked about whether the private lives of famous people should be exposed to the public or we should pay respect to their privacy. In this essay, we shall conflict, both views given.
On one hand, there is a symbiotic relationship between well-known people, which one side depends on the existence of the others. For instance, artistic workers need exposure to the audiences to remain their public recognition and broaden their career paths. Moreover, through communications, different aspects of stars are revealed, therefore, the community can comprehend the truth behind their words. For example, we get to know a political leader’s social activity better through media, consequently, we can decide whether he is suitable to lead the nation or not.
On the other hand, publishing personal information of singers, actors or politicians may lead to detrimental outcomes. The safety of these people is likely to be put in jeopardy due to the pursuit of shocking headlines. As an illustration, Diana, Princess of Wales, died in a tragic car accident for trying to lose the paparazzi chasing after. Furthermore, the desire for hot news about big names has brought not only insecurity and discomfort for that group of people, but also pose a threat to the lives of innocent people. In fact, when a scandal broke, involved artists’ families and friends shall endure the crowd’s criticism as well as themselves.
Although this trend offers us a great deal of entertaining, disastrous effects are led. The overwhelming exploit of creators’ private lives result in privacy invasion and unexpected depressing consequences. In conclusion, this practice should be controlled.
Following the rapid development of the entertainment industry and public figures’ popularity, information about what celebrities eat, wear or like
is sought
with great attention.
Accordingly
, a heated debate
is provoked
about whether the private
lives
of
famous
people
should
be exposed
to the
public or
we should pay respect to their privacy. In this essay, we shall conflict, both views
given
.
On one hand, there is a symbiotic relationship between well-known
people
, which one side depends on the existence of the others.
For instance
, artistic workers need exposure to the audiences to remain their public recognition and broaden their career paths.
Moreover
, through communications,
different
aspects of stars
are revealed
,
therefore
, the community can comprehend the truth behind their words.
For example
, we
get
to know a political leader’s social activity better through media,
consequently
, we can decide whether he is suitable to lead the nation or not.
On the other hand
, publishing personal information of singers, actors or politicians may lead to detrimental outcomes. The safety of these
people
is likely to
be put
in jeopardy due to the pursuit of shocking headlines. As an illustration, Diana, Princess of Wales,
died
in a tragic car accident for trying to lose the paparazzi chasing after.
Furthermore
, the desire for hot news about
big
names has brought not
only
insecurity and discomfort for that group of
people
,
but
also
pose a threat to the
lives
of innocent
people
. In fact, when a scandal broke, involved artists’ families and friends shall endure the crowd’s criticism
as well
as themselves.
Although this trend offers us a great deal of entertaining, disastrous effects
are led
. The overwhelming exploit of creators’ private
lives
result in privacy invasion and unexpected depressing consequences.
In conclusion
, this practice should
be controlled
.