It is often argued that the majority of people believe that zoos should be closed because zoos play a brutal role in animal's life. On the other side, some people opine that zoos are practical and protecting unique animals. This essay will discuss both sides of the viewpoints in the forthcoming paragraphs.
First of all, there are several disadvantages zoos should be shut down because they take the animals away from their natural habitat and zoos kept animals in the artificial environment. In other words, they kept the animals in the cages and also they have limited space over there, which may lead to losing the freedom to hunt for food. When it comes to they are fully dependant on the human. For instance, a recent study has found that in 2010, two zoos in the USA were forced to close by the government after several reports claiming the outrageous treatment of animals came to the light. Hence, it is apparent that how zoos exhibit animals with the aim of making money.
However, wildlife conservation was played a crucial role in the zoos. The one key benefit is that they can help to protect the endangered animals from the wildlife. On the other, there are numerous scientists to study animals and the behavior that allows them to scientist to do some experiment on the animals for their research. For example, it has been seen that animals research has been pivotal in the development of medical advances such as a vaccine, surgeries, cancer treatments, and other life-savings. Needless to say, all these merits stand in good stead as far as saving the unique animals in the zoos.
In conclusion, after analyzing both sides of the argument, it seems to me that zoos have no right to use animals for entertainment purposes or profit, and also government should close the zoos and free animals for their habitat.
It is
often
argued that the majority of
people
believe that zoos should
be closed
because
zoos play a brutal role in animal's life. On the
other
side,
some
people
opine that zoos are practical and protecting unique
animals
. This essay will discuss both sides of the viewpoints in the forthcoming paragraphs.
First of all
, there are several disadvantages zoos should
be shut
down
because
they take the
animals
away from their natural habitat and zoos
kept
animals
in the artificial environment. In
other
words, they
kept
the
animals
in the cages and
also
they have limited space over there, which may lead to losing the freedom to hunt for food.
When
it
comes
to they are
fully
dependant
on the human.
For instance
, a recent study has found that in 2010, two zoos in the USA
were forced
to close by the
government
after several reports claiming the outrageous treatment of
animals
came to the light.
Hence
, it is apparent that how zoos exhibit
animals
with the aim of making money.
However
, wildlife conservation
was played
a crucial role in the zoos. The one key benefit is that they can
help
to protect the endangered
animals
from the wildlife. On the
other
, there are numerous scientists to study
animals
and the behavior that
allows
them to scientist to do
some
experiment on the
animals
for their research.
For example
, it has been
seen
that
animals
research has been pivotal in the development of medical advances such as a vaccine, surgeries, cancer treatments, and
other
life-savings. Needless to say, all these merits stand in
good
stead as far as saving the unique
animals
in the zoos.
In conclusion
, after analyzing both sides of the argument, it seems to me that zoos have no right to
use
animals
for entertainment purposes or profit, and
also
government
should close the zoos and free
animals
for their habitat.