Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Some people believe that factories and private tour operators should bear the cost of cleaning up environmental pollution, instead of the government. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this?

Some people believe that factories and private tour operators should bear the cost of cleaning up environmental pollution, instead of the government. with this? 9Lw07
Environmental pollution is one of the major problems that we face today. The causes of environmental pollution are many. Vehicles are an important source of pollutants. So are factories. The fast growth of tourism has also led to the polluting of many beautiful regions of the world. Needless to say, some people believe that companies and private tour operators should be asked to bear the cost of cleaning up. After all, they play a very significant role in polluting the environment. But is it fair? Let’s examine. There is no denying the fact that factories play a very significant role in polluting the environment. Factories release poisonous gases and other waste products that are harmful to the environment. Sometimes these waste products which are full of hazardous substances are simply dumped into oceans and rivers. In many countries there are strict rules and regulations that require factories to clean up the waste they produce. However, in many parts of the world no such rules exist and industrialization is regarded as a necessary evil. Of course, factories generate jobs. They also produce goods to satiate our needs. But that doesn’t mean that they should be allowed to pollute the planet. In fact, if factories are held responsible for cleaning up the pollution they cause, they will adopt newer technologies that are less polluting. Tour operators can be held responsible for the pollution in many tourist spots. Some of the most beautiful regions in the world that attract millions of visitors every year have become some sort of dumping ground for waste. Plastic bottles and carry bags that visitors throw around have made these places unclean and unhygienic. Unlike pollution caused by factories, this problem can be solved to a great extent by making tour operators responsible for cleaning up. When they realize that they will have to do the cleaning up, they will definitely take measures that ensure responsible behaviour from their clients. On the flip side, tourism and factories are not the only causes of pollution. There are several others too. For example, vehicles are the number one source of atmospheric pollution. Air travel is another. Even the refrigerator that we use at home contributes towards polluting the environment. After analyzing the situation, it is not hard to see the role factories and tour operators play in polluting the environment. So it is only fair to ask them to bear the cost of cleaning up. On the flip side, they are not the only causes of pollution. So there is no point in expecting them to bear the total cost. After all, both tourism and industries are good for the economic growth of a nation. An ideal solution is to divide the cost of cleaning up between governments and factories or tour operators.
Environmental
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pollution
is one of the major problems that we face
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
today
. The
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
causes
of environmental
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pollution
are
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
. Vehicles are an
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
important
source of pollutants.
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
So
are
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
factories
. The
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
fast
growth of tourism has
also
led to the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
polluting
of
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
beautiful
regions of the world. Needless to say,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
believe that
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
companies
and private
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
tour
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
operators
should
be asked
to bear the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cost
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cleaning
up.
After all
, they play a
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
very
significant role in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
polluting
the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
environment
.
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
But
is it
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
fair
?
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
Let
’s examine.

There is no denying the fact that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
factories
play a
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
very
significant role in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
polluting
the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
environment
.
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Factories
release poisonous gases and other
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
waste
products that are harmful to the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
environment
.
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
Sometimes
these
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
waste
products which are full of hazardous substances are
simply
dumped into oceans and rivers. In
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
countries there are strict
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
rules
and regulations that require
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
factories
to clean up the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
waste
they produce.
However
, in
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
parts of the world no such
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
rules
exist and industrialization
is regarded
as a necessary evil.
Of course
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
factories
generate jobs. They
also
produce
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
goods
to satiate our needs.
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
But
that doesn’t mean that they should be
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
allowed
to pollute the planet. In fact, if
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
factories
are held
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
responsible
for
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cleaning
up the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pollution
they
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cause
, they will adopt newer technologies that are less polluting.

Tour
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
operators
can
be held
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
responsible
for the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pollution
in
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
tourist spots.
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
Some
of the most
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
beautiful
regions in the world that attract millions of visitors every year have become
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
sort of dumping ground for
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
waste
. Plastic bottles and carry bags that visitors throw around have made these places unclean and unhygienic. Unlike
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pollution
caused by
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
factories
, this problem can
be solved
to a great extent by making
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
tour
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
operators
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
responsible
for
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cleaning
up. When they realize that they will
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
have to
do the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cleaning
up, they will definitely take measures that ensure
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
responsible
Possible spelling mistake. 'behaviour' is British English.
behaviour
from their clients.

On the flip side, tourism and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
factories
are not the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
causes
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pollution
. There are several others too.
For example
, vehicles are the number one source of atmospheric
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pollution
. Air travel is another. Even the refrigerator that we
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
at home contributes towards
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
polluting
the environment.

After analyzing the situation, it is not
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
hard
to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
see
the role
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
factories
and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
tour
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
operators
play in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
polluting
the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
environment
.
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
So
it is
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
fair
to ask them to bear the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cost
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cleaning
up. On the flip side, they are not the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
causes
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pollution
.
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
So
there is no point in expecting them to bear the total
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cost
.
After all
, both tourism and industries are
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
good
for the economic growth of a nation. An ideal solution is to divide the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cost
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cleaning
up between
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
governments
and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
factories
or
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
tour
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
operators
.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Some people believe that factories and private tour operators should bear the cost of cleaning up environmental pollution, instead of the government. with this?

Essay
  American English
5 paragraphs
463 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 7.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • Some people believe that factories and private tour operators should bear the cost of cleaning up environmental pollution, instead of the government. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this?