Governments and private organizations across the world are continuing to invest a lot of money in space exploration; however, many people disagree with this. There are valid arguments on both sides, which we will discuss now.
On the one hand, people who oppose space travel point out that it is better to utilize that funding for solving more pressing issues on earth, such as poverty and over-population which are threatening the very existence of mankind. Opponents also argue that space pollution is causing a negative effect on the environment. They point out examples of recent shuttle launch, which burnt tons of fuel and left a lot of debris in the outer atmosphere resulting in a lot of space junk.
On the other hand, proponents argue that space exploration is a must because it gives mankind a chance to survive in case of a catastrophic event. Furthermore, they point out that relocating to another planet or solar system can only be possible through space travel. Supporters also point out the discoveries made in recent times and the advancements in the field of science and technology which were achieved by the International space station.
Overall, it appears that governments and private organizations should continue to fund space exploration since it has numerous benefits such as promoting technological advancements, improving living standards on earth and increasing the survival chances of humans in the event of a major natural catastrophe that makes our planet inhabitable. However, there is no justification for funding space programmes at the expense of other social welfare schemes.
Governments
and private organizations across the world are continuing to invest
a lot of
money in
space
exploration;
however
,
many
people
disagree with this. There are valid arguments on both sides, which we will discuss
now
.
On the one hand,
people
who oppose
space
travel
point
out that it is better to utilize that funding for solving more pressing issues on earth, such as poverty and over-population which are threatening the
very
existence of mankind. Opponents
also
argue that
space
pollution is causing a
negative
effect on the environment. They
point
out examples of recent shuttle launch, which burnt tons of fuel and
left
a lot of
debris in the outer atmosphere resulting in
a lot of
space
junk.
On the other hand
, proponents argue that
space
exploration is a
must
because
it gives mankind a chance to survive in case of a catastrophic
event
.
Furthermore
, they
point
out that relocating to another planet or solar system can
only
be possible through
space
travel. Supporters
also
point
out the discoveries made in recent times and the advancements in the field of science and technology which
were achieved
by the International
space
station.
Overall
, it appears that
governments
and private organizations should continue to fund
space
exploration since it has numerous benefits such as promoting technological advancements, improving living standards on earth and increasing the survival chances of humans in the
event
of a major natural catastrophe that
makes
our planet inhabitable.
However
, there is no justification for funding
space
programmes
at the expense of other social welfare schemes.