Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Some people believe that every human can create art. Other people think that art can only be created by people with special talents. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Art, along with other human activities, has become an inseparable part that enlightens one's spiritual life. While there are common beliefs that art is nonexistent without exceptional talents, some people still reckon that it can be produced by any individual, regardless of their capabilities. In my perspective, communications and expressions are undeniably its fundamental function, thus enabling everyone to accomplish those when creating art. According to one definition, art is the skill of producing objects, such as sculptures or dances. Its three main categories, namely visual art, performing art, and auditory art, obviously require specific artistry. Never will tough training and experiences turn incompetents into masters, but merely ameliorate their skills. That is among various explanations why hundreds of generations are always endeavoring to replicate immortal compositions, including Venus de Milo by the sculptor Alexandros. Additionally, copyright issues will not be of such paramount importance if any amateur can effortlessly compose a masterpiece. On the contrary, I opine that art is the application of imagination designed to express the creators' feelings. Scientific research of all time has proved the existence of this inventive talent in human minds. Moreover, works of art lend themselves to varied interpretations, so The Starry Night by Vincent van Gogh may be considered no more than a mass of children's scribbles in several situations. In other words, youngsters deserve to be addressed as 'expressionists' even when their drawings, which have successfully satisfied their aspirations of conveying emotions, seem more absurd than aesthetic. In summary, since a consensus on what constitutes art has yet to emerge, it is unfeasible to halt the discussion on which opinion outstrips the other. Based on the reasons mentioned above, however, I would lean towards the proposal that every single person has the privilege to generate artistic works following their styles.
Art
, along with other human activities, has become an inseparable part that enlightens one's spiritual life. While there are common beliefs that
art
is nonexistent without exceptional talents,
some
people
still
reckon that it can
be produced
by any individual, regardless of their capabilities. In my perspective, communications and expressions are
undeniably
its fundamental function,
thus
enabling everyone to accomplish those when creating art.

According to one definition,
art
is the
skill
of producing objects, such as sculptures or dances. Its three main categories,
namely
visual
art
, performing
art
, and auditory
art
,
obviously
require specific artistry.
Never will tough
training and experiences turn incompetents into masters,
but
merely
ameliorate their
skills
.
That is
among various explanations why hundreds of generations are always endeavoring to replicate immortal compositions, including Venus de Milo by the sculptor Alexandros.
Additionally
, copyright issues will not be of such paramount importance if any amateur can
effortlessly
compose a masterpiece.

On the contrary
, I opine that
art
is the application of imagination designed to express the creators' feelings. Scientific research of all time has proved the existence of this inventive talent in human minds.
Moreover
, works of
art
lend themselves to varied interpretations,
so
The Starry Night by Vincent van Gogh may
be considered
no more than a mass of children's scribbles in several situations.
In other words
, youngsters deserve to
be addressed
as 'expressionists' even when their drawings, which have
successfully
satisfied their aspirations of conveying emotions, seem more absurd than aesthetic.

In summary, since a consensus on what constitutes
art
has
yet
to emerge, it is unfeasible to halt the discussion on which opinion outstrips the other. Based on the reasons mentioned above,
however
, I would lean towards the proposal that every single person has the privilege to generate artistic works following their styles.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Some people believe that every human can create art. Other people think that art can only be created by people with special talents.

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
299 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 7.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts