According to some people, companies should focus on producing goods that are durable. Others insist that the emphasis should be on manufacturing cheap/affordable products. In this essay, I am going to examine this question from both points of view and give my own opinion on the topic.
On the one side of the argument, there are peoplewho argue that durability of the product should be the priority while manufacturing. People support this view because durable products cause less environmental damage. It is also possible to say that if we use our daily use items for longer time, we do not have to throw them away frequently, saving a lot of natural resources in the process and reducing environmental damages. One suitable example of this is toys made up of wood. They do not break easily and therefore can be used by many generations in a family, resulting in less trash overtime. Moreover, producing less waste / garbage in our lives will help in managing environmental damages caused by the piling up of trash in landfills.
However, others argue that emphasis should be on producing cheap goods. The main reason for supporting this belief is that cheap products are affordable to poor people. In other words, cheaper goods are more easily available to the less fortunate population and this helps them to enjoy these goods spending considerably less money. Consumer electronic goods are a great example of this. There are both cheap and durable models in the market. Those who are concerned about the price tag can opt for the affordable model and enjoy the technology.
In conclusion, both sides of the argument have their own merits. On balance, however, I feel that people should buy long lasting products because this is crucial for saving natural resources and reducing pollution by limiting the amount of garbage we generate.
According to
some
people
,
companies
should focus on producing
goods
that are durable. Others insist that the emphasis should be on manufacturing
cheap
/affordable
products
. In this essay, I am going to examine this question from both points of view and give my
own
opinion on the topic.
On the one side of the argument, there are
peoplewho
argue that durability of the
product
should be the priority while manufacturing.
People
support this view
because
durable
products
cause
less
environmental damage. It is
also
possible to say that if we
use
our daily
use
items for longer time, we do not
have to
throw them away
frequently
, saving
a lot of
natural resources in the process and reducing environmental damages. One suitable example of this is toys made up of wood. They do not break
easily
and
therefore
can be
used
by
many
generations in a family, resulting in
less
trash overtime.
Moreover
, producing
less
waste / garbage in our
lives
will
help
in managing environmental damages caused by the piling up of trash in landfills.
However
, others argue that emphasis should be on producing
cheap
goods
. The main reason for supporting this belief is that
cheap
products
are affordable to poor
people
.
In other words
, cheaper
goods
are more
easily
available to the
less
fortunate population and this
helps
them to enjoy these
goods
spending
considerably
less
money. Consumer electronic
goods
are a great example of this. There are both
cheap
and durable models in the market. Those who
are concerned
about the price tag can opt for the affordable model and enjoy the technology.
In conclusion
, both sides of the argument have their
own
merits. On balance,
however
, I feel that
people
should
buy
long lasting
products
because
this is crucial for saving natural resources and reducing pollution by limiting the amount of garbage we generate.