It is generally a heated debate about teenagers, whether all the subjects have to be included in their academic studies. Several people object to the idea of studying all the subjects; however, various others believe it is quite relevant for them to opt for all. In my personal opinion, encouraging to select the subjects in which they are highly interested after high school is comparatively orientational than enforcing everything on them.
According to a few studies between different age groups, after high school, teenage students tend to have increased maturity to understand their priorities and obtain clarity towards pursuing their career forward. Furthermore, forcing them to study irrelevant fields would potentially decrease their efficiency; therefore, affecting their opportunities to achieve results they are determined to. In addition, parents burden their kids by imposing stress to go through overall study system, which not only discourages them but also hits them on their mental stabilities. However, there are many educational institutions who recently began opting a modern method of categorizing the fields and help the pupil to choose and shine in it.
Secondly, it is not necessarily true that all the students should be able to accomplish similarly all aspects. Each of them has a definite interest and plan to chase them distinctly. Moreover, there are various incidents in the history of mankind, for example, Albert Einstein, who prove that excellency is not measured in achieving better score but to show their brilliance in their field of interest. Clearly, this burden should be removed on every child for the betterment of society.
In conclusion, burdening childhood by imposing irrelevant studies is no help to develop and encourage every teen to excel their study of interest. Betterment in education systems would consequently, help to demote the stress caused in the current knowledge world.
It is
generally
a heated debate about
teenagers
, whether all the subjects
have to
be included
in their academic
studies
. Several
people
object to the
idea
of studying all the subjects;
however
, various others believe it is quite relevant for them to opt for all. In my personal opinion, encouraging to select the subjects in which they are
highly
interested after high school is
comparatively
orientational
than enforcing everything on them.
According to a few
studies
between
different
age groups, after high school, teenage students tend to have increased maturity to understand their priorities and obtain clarity towards pursuing their career forward.
Furthermore
, forcing them to
study
irrelevant fields would
potentially
decrease their efficiency;
therefore
, affecting their opportunities to achieve results they
are determined
to.
In addition
, parents burden their kids by imposing
stress
to go through
overall
study
system, which not
only
discourages them
but
also
hits them on their mental
stabilities
.
However
, there are
many
educational institutions who recently began opting a modern method of categorizing the fields and
help
the pupil to choose and shine in it.
Secondly
, it is not
necessarily
true that all the students should be able to accomplish
similarly
all aspects. Each of them has a
definite
interest and plan to chase them
distinctly
.
Moreover
, there are various incidents in the history of mankind,
for example
, Albert Einstein, who prove that excellency is not measured in achieving better score
but
to
show
their brilliance in their field of interest.
Clearly
, this burden should
be removed
on every child for the betterment of society.
In conclusion
, burdening childhood by imposing irrelevant
studies
is no
help
to develop and encourage every teen to excel their
study
of interest. Betterment in education systems would
consequently
,
help
to demote the
stress
caused in the
current
knowledge world.