It is frequently said that community service without a stripend should mandatory be added to secondary education course structure such as labouring for a church, enhancing the neighbourhood or educating athletics to juniors. Personally, I am in favour of this opinion.
First and foremost, it is a worthy cause to claim that it will merely be beneficial to youngsters. That is owning to the fact that adolescents may probably be able to learn through practice various values, particularly those concerning team effort, solidarity, volunteering and many more. For instance, as a child, I used to work full-time as an unpaid employee for a charity and I understood numerous things about helping other people and, generally speaking, offering my services to a superior purpose.
Moreover, by assisting in the improvement of their surrounding area, teenagers can possibly feel that they are usefull members of their society. As a result, it will facilitate them to avoid outlaw and criminal attitudes, which may probably lead them on hazardous paths. Furthemore, by having taught sports to younger children, young pupils may understand more about themselves and the way that interact with other individual. Therefore, they will develop mainly values such as patience and their ability to empathise with the opposite opinion.
On the other hand, a strong argument can be made by the flip side. Some people may think that, due to the fact that it is an unpaid service, it may probaly be a waste of time and children may not be benefied at all, since there is not a salary. However, it is regularly observed that those juniors having offered an undischarded service to their community became more competitive and productive individuals in a demanding workplace during their adult lives compared to others who do not.
In conclusion, I am convinced that for all those mentioned reasons, an unpaid community service shall be a compulsory asset of all high school programmes.
It is
frequently
said that community
service
without a
stripend
should mandatory be
added
to secondary education course structure such as
labouring
for a church, enhancing the
neighbourhood
or educating athletics to juniors.
Personally
, I am in
favour
of this opinion.
First
and foremost, it is a worthy cause to claim that it will
merely
be beneficial to youngsters. That
is owning
to the fact that adolescents may
probably
be able to learn through practice various values,
particularly
those concerning team effort, solidarity, volunteering and
many
more.
For instance
, as a child, I
used
to work full-time as an unpaid employee for a charity and I understood numerous things about helping
other
people
and,
generally
speaking, offering my
services
to a superior purpose.
Moreover
, by assisting in the improvement of their surrounding area,
teenagers
can
possibly
feel that they are
usefull
members of their society.
As a result
, it will facilitate them to avoid outlaw and criminal attitudes, which may
probably
lead them on hazardous paths.
Furthemore
, by having taught sports to younger children, young pupils may understand more about themselves and the way that interact with
other
individual.
Therefore
, they will develop
mainly
values such as patience and their ability to
empathise
with the opposite opinion.
On the
other
hand, a strong argument can
be made
by the flip side.
Some
people
may
think
that, due to the fact that it is an unpaid
service
, it may
probaly
be a waste of time and children may not be
benefied
at all, since there is not a salary.
However
, it is
regularly
observed that those juniors having offered an
undischarded
service
to their community became more competitive and productive individuals in a demanding workplace during their adult
lives
compared to others who do not.
In conclusion
, I
am convinced
that for all those mentioned reasons, an unpaid community
service
shall be a compulsory asset of all high school
programmes
.
Funny
Love
Wow
Angry
Sad