It is irrefutable that air travel causes pollution and uses a lot of fuel, but I disagree that air travel should be
restricted. I believe that restricting air travel would solve some problems but would lead to many other
problems.
At a time when people all over the world worry about the decreasing level of fossil fuels and global
warming, it is right to take action to save the planet Earth. However, to simply discourage flights is not the
answer. lnternational tourism has become the backbone of many economies of the world. Many countries
are earning from tourism. Many people are employed in this industry. Many businesses like hotels and
leisure centres are dependent on tourists. So, if we discourage international tourism, it would create new
and even worse problems. Many businesses would go broke and many people would be without jobs.
Air flight also enables intercultural exchanges between countries. The advent of cheap air fare makes it
possible for people the world over to travel regularly, regardless of the purpose of the trip. Therefore,
people have the opportunities to learn from different cultures and have a better understanding of
countries they used to be unfamiliar with. This, in turn, enhances cultural communications between
countries.
It is true that air travel consumes oil, but other modes of transportation are also causing pollution and
using fuel. Discouraging private cars and encouraging people to use public transport could help save the
environmental resources in a big way. Therefore it would be a very unpractical decision to restrict air travel
at the cost of people's mobility, or worse, at the cost of the development of the economy. Technology
could also be used to produce more environmentally friendly and fuel efficient engines.
Summing up, instead of restricting air travel, we should develop more efficient engine that produces more
energy output with less fuel and fewer major air pollutants. We should also focus on limiting private
vehicles and encouraging public transport
It is irrefutable that
air
travel
causes pollution and
uses
a lot of
fuel
,
but
I disagree that
air
travel
should
be
restricted
. I believe that restricting
air
travel
would solve
some
problems
but
would lead to
many
other
problems.
At a time when
people
all over the world worry about the decreasing level of fossil
fuels
and global
warming, it is right to take action to save the planet Earth.
However
, to
simply
discourage flights is not the
answer.
lnternational
tourism has become the backbone of
many
economies of the world.
Many
countries
are earning from tourism.
Many
people
are employed
in this industry.
Many
businesses like hotels and
leisure
centres
are dependent on tourists.
So
, if we discourage international tourism, it would create new
and even worse problems.
Many
businesses would go broke and
many
people
would be without jobs.
Air flight
also
enables intercultural exchanges between countries. The advent of
cheap
air
fare
makes
it
possible for
people
the world over to
travel
regularly
, regardless of the purpose of the trip.
Therefore
,
people
have the opportunities to learn from
different
cultures and have a better understanding of
countries they
used
to be unfamiliar with. This, in turn, enhances cultural communications between
countries.
It is true that
air
travel
consumes oil,
but
other modes of transportation are
also
causing pollution and
using
fuel
. Discouraging private cars and encouraging
people
to
use
public transport could
help
save the
environmental resources in a
big
way.
Therefore
it would be a
very
unpractical decision to restrict
air
travel
at the cost of
people
's mobility, or worse, at the cost of the development of the economy. Technology
could
also
be
used
to produce more
environmentally
friendly and
fuel
efficient engines.
Summing up,
instead
of restricting
air
travel
, we should develop more efficient engine that produces more
energy output with less
fuel
and fewer major
air
pollutants. We should
also
focus on limiting private
vehicles and encouraging public
transport