Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Some people befi'eve thol oir lrovel should be reslricfed becouse il couses serious pollution ond uses up lhe world's fuel resources. Io whof exfenf do you ogree or disogree?

Some people befi'eve thol oir lrovel should be reslricfed becouse il couses serious pollution ond uses up lhe world's fuel resources. Io whof exfenf do you ogree or disogree? xOGw6
It is irrefutable that air travel causes pollution and uses a lot of fuel, but I disagree that air travel should be restricted. I believe that restricting air travel would solve some problems but would lead to many other problems. At a time when people all over the world worry about the decreasing level of fossil fuels and global warming, it is right to take action to save the planet Earth. However, to simply discourage flights is not the answer. lnternational tourism has become the backbone of many economies of the world. Many countries are earning from tourism. Many people are employed in this industry. Many businesses like hotels and leisure centres are dependent on tourists. So, if we discourage international tourism, it would create new and even worse problems. Many businesses would go broke and many people would be without jobs. Air flight also enables intercultural exchanges between countries. The advent of cheap air fare makes it possible for people the world over to travel regularly, regardless of the purpose of the trip. Therefore, people have the opportunities to learn from different cultures and have a better understanding of countries they used to be unfamiliar with. This, in turn, enhances cultural communications between countries. It is true that air travel consumes oil, but other modes of transportation are also causing pollution and using fuel. Discouraging private cars and encouraging people to use public transport could help save the environmental resources in a big way. Therefore it would be a very unpractical decision to restrict air travel at the cost of people's mobility, or worse, at the cost of the development of the economy. Technology could also be used to produce more environmentally friendly and fuel efficient engines. Summing up, instead of restricting air travel, we should develop more efficient engine that produces more energy output with less fuel and fewer major air pollutants. We should also focus on limiting private vehicles and encouraging public transport
It is irrefutable that
air
travel
causes pollution and
uses
a lot of
fuel
,
but
I disagree that
air
travel
should
be restricted
. I believe that restricting
air
travel
would solve
some
problems
but
would lead to
many
other

problems.

At a time when
people
all over the world worry about the decreasing level of fossil
fuels
and global

warming, it is right to take action to save the planet Earth.
However
, to
simply
discourage flights is not the

answer.
lnternational
tourism has become the backbone of
many
economies of the world.
Many
countries

are earning from tourism.
Many
people
are employed
in this industry.
Many
businesses like hotels and

leisure
centres
are dependent on tourists.
So
, if we discourage international tourism, it would create new

and even worse problems.
Many
businesses would go broke and
many
people
would be without jobs.

Air flight
also
enables intercultural exchanges between countries. The advent of
cheap
air
fare
makes
it

possible for
people
the world over to
travel
regularly
, regardless of the purpose of the trip.
Therefore
,

people
have the opportunities to learn from
different
cultures and have a better understanding of

countries they
used
to be unfamiliar with. This, in turn, enhances cultural communications between

countries.

It is true that
air
travel
consumes oil,
but
other modes of transportation are
also
causing pollution and

using
fuel
. Discouraging private cars and encouraging
people
to
use
public transport could
help
save the

environmental resources in a
big
way.
Therefore
it would be a
very
unpractical decision to restrict
air
travel

at the cost of
people
's mobility, or worse, at the cost of the development of the economy. Technology

could
also
be
used
to produce more
environmentally
friendly and
fuel
efficient engines.

Summing up,
instead
of restricting
air
travel
, we should develop more efficient engine that produces more

energy output with less
fuel
and fewer major
air
pollutants. We should
also
focus on limiting private

vehicles and encouraging public
transport
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Some people befi'eve thol oir lrovel should be reslricfed becouse il couses serious pollution ond uses up lhe world's fuel resources. Io whof exfenf do you ogree or disogree?

Essay
  American English
6 paragraphs
325 words
5.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.0
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts