In this society, some people argue that famous sport men are having natural talents towards their sports and some people, including me argue believe that it is only because of their commitments and hard work they are able to reach good position. The following essay state points to explain both the sides with my opinion.
On the one hand, if a child is having an inborn interest in any field, they start showing their eagerness in that particular space from their childhood without getting any motivations. Mostly, they start showcasing the passion after watching the sport on the TV or after seeing elders playing it. At this time, it is the elder's responsibility to identify their talent and create space for children to develop their passion. With natural talents, they can easily start practising and concentration on the sports but to be successful, they have to practise well. For Instance, Indian well-known cricket player, Sachin is the son of famous cricket and he started showing interest from his childhood. Additionally, with dedication and practise, he is able to reach good position.
On the other hand, most of the famous sportsmen are not having natural talent in their field. They get their interest in the path by watching or getting motivational comments from the teachers and elders. In these days, most of the schools are having sports as an extra-curriculum activity. While involving in the activity, students get passion towards it. After this, it is the parent's role to find a good trainer to guide them in the area. They have to get a good teacher to explain the person about the sports and how much practise is needed to become expert in the area. Furthermore, it is hard work and the dedication leads the individual to become a prominent person in their sports area.
In conclusion, only with natural talents, a person cannot become a well known sport man. It purely depends on, how much effort they have put in the field and how they are viewing it in their life.
In this society,
some
people
argue that
famous
sport
men
are
having
natural
talents
towards their
sports
and
some
people
, including me argue believe that it is
only
because
of their commitments and
hard
work they are able to reach
good
position. The following essay state points to
explain
both the sides with my opinion.
On the one hand, if a child is
having
an inborn interest in any field, they
start
showing their eagerness in that particular space from their childhood without getting any motivations.
Mostly
, they
start
showcasing the passion after watching the
sport
on the TV or after seeing elders playing it. At this time, it is the elder's responsibility to identify their
talent
and create space for children to develop their passion. With
natural
talents
, they can
easily
start
practising
and concentration on the
sports
but
to be successful, they
have to
practise
well.
For Instance
, Indian well-known cricket player,
Sachin
is the son of
famous
cricket and
he
started
showing interest from his childhood.
Additionally
, with dedication and
practise
, he is able to reach
good
position.
On the other hand
, most of the
famous
sportsmen are not
having
natural
talent
in their field. They
get
their interest in the path by watching or getting motivational comments from the teachers and elders. In these days, most of the schools are
having
sports
as an extra-curriculum activity. While involving in the activity, students
get
passion towards it. After this, it is the parent's role to find a
good
trainer to guide them in the area. They
have to
get
a
good
teacher to
explain
the person about the
sports
and how much
practise
is needed
to become expert in the area.
Furthermore
, it is
hard
work and the dedication leads the individual to become a prominent person in their
sports
area.
In conclusion
,
only
with
natural
talents
, a person cannot become a well known
sport
man
. It
purely
depends on, how much effort they have put in the field and how they are viewing it in their life.