Search
Vocabularying
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

Write about the following topic: Some people argue that all experimentation on animals is bad and should be outlawed. However, others believe that important scientific discoveries can be made from animal experiments. Can experimentation on animals be justified? Are there any alternatives? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge and experience.

: Some people argue that all experimentation on animals is bad and should be outlawed. However, others believe that important scientific discoveries can be made from animal experiments. Can experimentation on animals be justified? Are there any alternatives? dj2d

The argument over experimenting animals should be outlawed, however others tends to believe that important scientific discoveries can be achieved by experimenting on the animals. I firmly believe in not killing the animals in order to invent something incredible. Firstly, enormous inventions could only have happened by experimenting on animals. Scientists are in favour of this that before implementing on human beings, it should be tried on animals. In one way it makes sense and on the other hand, it does not. Discoveries made by famous folks have been successful by experimenting on the animals. Furthermore, medical professionals and other reserachers wants to save human lives and in order to do so, they put animals lives on risk. On the contrary, people does not support the idea of killing animals and a law should be enforced. By killing animals, human beings are the reasons for their extinction and endangered species. Human beings are becoming selfish and greedy that they forget they are putting someone's life on risk. Scientific discoveries can still take place without harming them. The way technology is so advanced in the 21st century, there should be a way where animals does not have to be killed. Scientists can grow the tissues in laboratories and should investigate their studies on them. There should be a strict law about protecting these species. To sum up, there can be various alternatives in order to make the finest inventions. People need to realize that by harming fauna species, they are ending someone's life.

The argument over You use this word too often, consider replacing it withexploreanalyzeexamine
experimenting
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
 should be outlawed
, however
 others tends to believe that This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:vitalcriticalessential
important
 scientific discoveries can be achieved
 by You use this word too often, consider replacing it withexploreanalyzeexamine
experimenting
 on the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
. I firmly
 believe in not killing the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
 in order to invent something incredible.

Firstly
, enormous inventions could This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exclusively
only
 have happened by You use this word too often, consider replacing it withexploreanalyzeexamine
experimenting
 on You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
. Scientists are in Possible spelling mistake. 'favour' is British English.favor
favour
 of this that This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:previouslyprior to
before
 implementing on You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpersonalanimalmortal
human
 beings, it should be tried
 on You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
. In one way it This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :createsconstructsmanufacturesproduces
makes
 sense and on the other hand
, it does not. Discoveries made by This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:well-known
famous
 folks have been successful by You use this word too often, consider replacing it withexploreanalyzeexamine
experimenting
 on the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
. Furthermore
, medical professionals and other Possible spelling mistake found.researchers
reserachers
 wants to save You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpersonalanimalmortal
human
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :resides
lives
 and in order to do This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:consequently
so
, they put You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :resides
lives
 on This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :hazarddanger
risk
.

On the contrary
, This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualsnationsociety
people
If 'people' is plural here, don't use the third-person singular verb.do
does
 not support the This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :thoughtconceptnotion
idea
 of killing You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
 and a law should be enforced
. By killing You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
, You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpersonalanimalmortal
human
 beings are the reasons for their extinction and endangered species. You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpersonalanimalmortal
Human
 beings are becoming selfish and greedy that they forget they are putting someone's life on This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :hazarddanger
risk
. Scientific discoveries can still
 take place without harming them. The way technology is This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:consequently
so
 advanced in the 21st century, there should be a way where You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
Possible agreement error. You should probably use: "do".do
does
 not This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:ought to
have to
be killed
. Scientists can grow the tissues in laboratories and should investigate their studies on them. There should be a strict law about protecting these species.

To sum up, there can be various alternatives in order to This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :createconstructmanufactureproduce
make
 the finest inventions. This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualsnationsociety
People
 need to realize that by harming fauna species, they are ending someone's life. 