Some people advocate the death penalty for those who comitted violent crimes. Others say that capital punishment is unacceptable in contemporary society. Describe the advantages and disadvantages of the death penalty and give your opinion.
Some people advocate the death penalty for those who comitted violent crimes. Others say that capital punishment is unacceptable in contemporary society. Describe the advantages and disadvantages of the death penalty and give your opinion. 3r1m
It is argued, that criminals should get the death penalty for crimes that include violence, while others think that this is an outdated action for in modern and contemporary society. This essay agrees, that the death penalty is the only way to show what consequences violent crimes have. It will suggest that criminals should suffer for their actions, however it will submit that the government still murders the criminal and thus, we can considered them as criminals, too.
First of all, a crime where someone was killed is considered as a major crime. Those murderer get most of the time arrested for the rest of their lives. However, people who have conducted many crimes, for example homecide, rapery and assault get the death penalty. This basically means, that the criminals get arrested for the rest of their lives but not like those who die naturally in prison, the criminal gets killed by the government. Thus, this a method to punish those who have killed people and thereby, stole their lives. It shows, that criminals have to pay with their lives too, if they commit such a horrible crime. Furthermore, this action may show other criminals what consequences their actions have and that they will suffer from the bad actions. Thus, maybe less crimes will happen in the future because criminals know that they will die too.
Despite all the positive aspects of killing a murderer in prison, there are still some downsides to this action. The death penalty should show the citizens that their actions have consequences but the government still does the same thing like the criminals. They murdered a human beeing. Most of the time this action is very painful for a criminal because they do not die directly. They get a shot injection with poison inside of it, thus their heart stops beating and until this happens it can take up to 30 minutes. So basically the government implies such bad actions even more in the society by doing the exact thing. Thereby, many criminals will become even more motivated to murder people because death and killing someone is an action which is a government implies into the society. That's why many people hold the opinion, that in order to have a contemporary society we need to set stop such bad actions.
Overall, one can say that having the government kill people shows citizens that actions like this are correct when someone should suffer from their actions. However, I believe that we need such strict rules in order to punish bad people with a horrible fine.
To conclude, one can say that it is good to have fines like the death penalty. Thus, criminals know that they will die to if they kill someone. The death penalty should scare people, in order to prevent violent crimes.
It
is argued
, that
criminals
should
get
the death
penalty
for
crimes
that include violence, while others
think
that this is an outdated
action
for in modern and contemporary
society
. This essay
agrees
, that the death
penalty
is the
only
way to
show
what consequences violent
crimes
have. It will suggest that
criminals
should suffer for their actions,
however
it will submit that the
government
still
murders the
criminal
and
thus
, we can
considered
them as
criminals
, too.
First of all
, a
crime
where
someone
was killed
is considered
as a major
crime
. Those murderer
get
most of the time arrested for the rest of their
lives
.
However
,
people
who have conducted
many
crimes
,
for example
homecide
,
rapery
and assault
get
the death
penalty
. This
basically
means, that the
criminals
get
arrested for the rest of their
lives
but
not like those who
die
naturally
in prison, the
criminal
gets
killed by the
government
.
Thus
, this a method to punish those who have killed
people
and thereby, stole their
lives
. It
shows
, that
criminals
have to
pay with their
lives
too, if they commit such a horrible
crime
.
Furthermore
, this
action
may
show
other
criminals
what consequences their actions have and that they will suffer from the
bad
actions.
Thus
, maybe
less
crimes
will happen in the future
because
criminals
know that they will
die
too.
Despite all the
positive
aspects of killing a murderer in prison, there are
still
some
downsides to this
action
. The death
penalty
should
show
the citizens that their actions have consequences
but
the
government
still
does the same thing
like
the
criminals
. They murdered a human
beeing
. Most of the time this
action
is
very
painful for a
criminal
because
they do not
die
directly
. They
get
a shot injection with poison
inside of
it,
thus
their heart
stops
beating and until this happens it can take up to 30 minutes.
So
basically
the
government
implies such
bad
actions even more in the
society
by doing the exact thing. Thereby,
many
criminals
will become even more motivated to murder
people
because
death and killing
someone
is an
action
which is a
government
implies into the
society
. That's why
many
people
hold the opinion, that in order to have a contemporary
society
we need to set
stop
such
bad
actions.
Overall
, one can say that having the
government
kill
people
shows
citizens that actions like this are correct when
someone
should suffer from their actions.
However
, I believe that we need such strict
rules
in order to punish
bad
people
with a horrible fine.
To conclude
, one can say that it is
good
to have fines like the death
penalty
.
Thus
,
criminals
know that they will
die
to if they kill
someone
. The death
penalty
should scare
people
, in order to
prevent
violent
crimes
.