It is the principal duty of parents and teachers to help their children evolve into a responsible citizen to survive in the modern society. For this, they make use of every possible mode to help their children mould into disciplined one. One of such method is lining more rules and providing lesser liberity. However, I opposed it as because it generates hindrance in their growing up period.
To commence with, firstly, there are those set of people who asserts that making large numbers of rules would transform jouveniles into the disciplined citizens in future. For instance, children who are nurtured in much discipline environs behave unpredicatably mischievous in the absence of their guardians and when they left alone.
Furthermore, creating number of restrictions would provide opportunity to parents to be fearless a their children would not cought by crimes and drugs. For example, more rules builds the sense of terror in jouvenile's mind which helps keeping them far away from uncivilized deeds.
On flip side, other set of individuals advocates that there will be no utilization of implimenting rules due to the fact that they have a tender age which discloses that they do not have adequate sense of right and wrong facts. Although, being parents and scholars it is our fundamental duty to create certain amount of rules and shed light on the right path to follow for them.
In the nut shell, I personally do not believe in the conservative statement of making more rules and alloting small amount of freedom. Also, this reduce the psychological and physical growth. I am not advocating that we should completely remove the restriction as because this will make young generation as fearless from parents and teachers and this would definitely end up by making them wild civilians.
It is the principal duty of
parents
and teachers to
help
their
children
evolve into a responsible citizen to survive in the modern society. For this, they
make
use
of every possible mode to
help
their
children
mould
into disciplined one. One of such method is lining more
rules
and providing lesser
liberity
.
However
, I opposed it as
because
it generates hindrance in their growing up period.
To commence with,
firstly
, there are those set of
people
who asserts that making large numbers of
rules
would transform
jouveniles
into the disciplined citizens
in future
.
For instance
,
children
who
are nurtured
in much discipline environs behave
unpredicatably
mischievous in the absence of their guardians and when they
left
alone.
Furthermore
, creating number of restrictions would provide opportunity to
parents
to be fearless a their
children
would not
cought
by crimes and drugs.
For example
, more
rules
builds the sense of terror in
jouvenile
's mind which
helps
keeping them far away from uncivilized deeds.
On flip side, other set of individuals advocates that there will be no utilization of
implimenting
rules
due to the fact that they have a tender age which discloses that they do not have adequate sense of right and
wrong
facts. Although, being
parents
and scholars it is our fundamental duty to create certain amount of
rules
and shed light on the right path to follow for them.
In the nut shell, I
personally
do not believe in the conservative statement of making more
rules
and
alloting
small
amount of freedom.
Also
, this
reduce
the psychological and physical growth. I am not advocating that we should completely remove the restriction as
because
this will
make
young generation as fearless from
parents
and teachers and this would definitely
end
up by making them wild civilians.