Oganisations focus on the aspects of dressing smart and quality of work. On this note, what makes a difference between them is their main stream based on the company's long term decision towards the path of success. Ofcourse, both the categories mentioned, final motto might be same whereas, the path they choose might be different.
Let us consider a restaurant, a typical small - medium scaled organisation where its main agenda is to make the customers visit their store again. If do look in a broader version of the restaurant employees or owners perspective, they do inculcate a culture that the best aesthetic appearance impresses the customers providing them a clear picture of the company's way of approach, thereby letting him to know that they are bound to certain values firmly.
On the counterpart, let us consider another organisation which provides amazing results to its clients. On this note let me cite an example of the world's famous company "Google", it lets its employes to come in whatever fashion he/she is comfortable, which they believe would result in the best possible outcomes from the employee. Researchers, do confirm that the quality of work is maximised when a person is dresses themselves comfortably. startups can also be accounted in this context, where they deliver accurate work and aesthetically impressive outputs to their clients.
on the broader context, what does really matter is the place where you work and the alignment of their values, policies with their short and long term goals. In my opinion, quality of work should be given the top notch priority rather than the visual judgement of a person. the reason is that you will be defined by your work force and ability to deliver the required one rather than your aesthetics. An efficient person can light a candle with no resources in the dark using his ability to create.
Oganisations
focus on the aspects of dressing smart and quality of
work
. On this note, what
makes
a difference between them is their main stream based on the
company
's long term decision towards the path of success.
Ofcourse
, both the categories mentioned, final motto might be same whereas, the path they choose might be
different
.
Let
us consider a restaurant, a typical
small
-
medium scaled
organisation
where its main agenda is to
make
the customers visit their store again. If do look in a broader version of the restaurant employees or owners perspective, they do inculcate a culture that the best aesthetic appearance impresses the customers providing them a
clear
picture of the
company
's way of approach, thereby letting him to know that they
are bound
to certain values
firmly
.
On the counterpart,
let
us consider another
organisation
which provides amazing results to its clients. On this note
let
me cite an example of the world's
famous
company
"
Google
"
, it
lets
its
employes
to
come
in whatever fashion he/she is comfortable, which they believe would result in the best possible outcomes from the employee. Researchers, do confirm that the quality of
work
is
maximised
when a person is dresses themselves
comfortably
.
startups
can
also
be accounted
in this context, where they deliver accurate
work
and
aesthetically
impressive outputs to their clients.
on
the broader context, what does
really
matter is the place where you
work
and the alignment of their values, policies with their short and long term goals. In my opinion, quality of
work
should be
given
the
top notch
priority
rather
than the visual judgement of a person.
the
reason is that you will
be defined
by your
work
force and ability to deliver the required one
rather
than your aesthetics. An efficient person can light a candle with no resources in the dark using his ability to create.