It is a highly debatable issue whether multinational companies (MNCS) should be encouraged by the governments of developing countries, or whether the local companies should be promoted. I firmly belleve that MNCS are good for the economic growth. Therefore, I disagree with the given statement that MNCS chould be shut out. A number of arguments surround my opinion.
There are many advantages of MNCS, To begin with, these provide employment, which usually pays better than other available opportunities. What is more, they train local labour with more sophisticated techniques, which in the long run bring benefits to the host country. They also raise the growth rate of host nation by introducing new investment and new technology. To add to it, they promote efficient production and bring a broader range of products to the widest possible market. Furthermore, such MNCS promote improvement or development of various supporting industries or complementary industries. For example, if an MNC opens in a place, then many businesses open in the neighbourhood, which cater to the workers working in these MNCS. In this way, these MNCS stabillize and stimulate local economies, and raise standards of living.
Another important advantage of MNCS is that they induce their local rivals to become more innavative and competitive. For instance, it is a well known fact that Indian company Videocon has improved its standard to compete with MNCS such as Samsung and Sony. Finally, these companies promote positive values, such as diversity, and equality for women. They also create an environment of nonviolence and international cooperation.
neighbourhood, which cater to the workers working in these MNCS. In this way, these MNCS stabillize and stimulate local economies, and raise standards of living.
To conclude, MNCS may have their negative points, but their pros far outweigh their cons. So, they should be promoted by the governments of developing countries.
It is a
highly
debatable issue whether multinational
companies
(
MNCS
) should
be encouraged
by the
governments
of
developing countries
, or whether the
local
companies
should
be promoted
. I
firmly
belleve
that
MNCS
are
good
for the economic growth.
Therefore
, I disagree with the
given
statement that
MNCS
chould
be shut
out. A number of arguments surround my opinion.
There are
many
advantages of
MNCS
, To
begin
with, these provide employment, which
usually
pays better than other available opportunities.
What is more
, they train
local
labour
with more sophisticated techniques, which in the long run bring benefits to the host country. They
also
raise the growth rate of host nation by introducing new investment and new technology. To
add
to it, they promote efficient production and bring a broader range of products to the widest possible market.
Furthermore
, such
MNCS
promote improvement or development of various supporting industries or complementary industries.
For example
, if an
MNC
opens in a place, then
many
businesses open in the
neighbourhood
, which cater to the workers working in these
MNCS
. In this way, these
MNCS
stabillize
and stimulate
local
economies, and raise standards of living.
Another
important
advantage of
MNCS
is that they induce their
local
rivals to become more
innavative
and competitive.
For instance
, it is a well known fact that Indian
company
Videocon
has
improved
its standard to compete with
MNCS
such as Samsung and Sony.
Finally
, these
companies
promote
positive
values, such as diversity, and equality for women. They
also
create an environment of nonviolence and international cooperation.
neighbourhood
, which cater to the workers working in these
MNCS
. In this way, these
MNCS
stabillize
and stimulate
local
economies, and raise standards of living.
To conclude
,
MNCS
may have their
negative
points,
but
their pros far outweigh their cons.
So
, they should
be promoted
by the
governments
of
developing countries
.