At present, the number of elderly people working is considered to be increased in various countries. In response to this statement, the essay will elaborate on both benefits and drawbacks to maintain that choosing an absolute stance will undermine the issue’s complexity.
To commence with, aged people with qualified skills play fundamental roles in particular jobs. Specifically, professors who usually are over 55 years old are beneficial for scientific developments. Being an expert in a specific field required lots of hard studying and experienced working time spanning over 30 years, as a result, they need a longer time to work than other occupations to contribute to the scientific developments. An extensive survey conducted by Harvard University in 2019 reported that 67% of physical researchers and scientists received patents as well as gained the highest citation publications award after they were 60 years old. Therefore, elderly employment is necessary in some specific occupations.
On the other hand, the phenomenon of old working ages could bring drawbacks to social balancing. Due to the limitation of job opportunities, people work longer could increase highly competition in the landscape of exponential population growth. Fresh graduates may be deprived of the chance to work by elderly people, thus it links to the high rate of unemployment and other social problems. For instance, in Japan, when the government executed the labor law that employees retired after 65 years old since 2015, the unemployment rate in 2017 surged 12% compared to 5% in the previous years. Thus, the government should consider the extension of employment ages.
In conclusion, the essay has maintained an impartial stance due to the byzantine nature of this issue: on the one hand, elderly employees are beneficial in some particular jobs; on the other hand, the extension of working ages could deprive the job opportunities for the youngster, which influenced on social problems. 
At present, the number of  
elderly
  people
  working
  is considered
 to  
be increased
 in various countries. In response to this statement, the essay will elaborate on both benefits and drawbacks to maintain that choosing an absolute stance will undermine the issue’s complexity.
To commence with, aged  
people
 with qualified  
skills
 play fundamental roles  
in particular
  jobs
.  
Specifically
, professors who  
usually are
 over 55 years  
old
 are beneficial for scientific developments. Being an expert in a specific field required lots of  
hard
 studying and experienced  
working
 time spanning over 30 years,  
as a result
, they need a longer time to work than  
other
 occupations to contribute to the scientific developments. An extensive survey conducted by Harvard University in 2019 reported that 67% of physical researchers and scientists received patents  
as well
 as gained the highest citation publications award after they were 60 years  
old
.  
Therefore
,  
elderly
 employment is necessary in  
some
 specific occupations.
On the  
other
 hand, the phenomenon of  
old
  working
 ages could bring drawbacks to social balancing. Due to the limitation of  
job
 opportunities,  
people
 work longer could increase  
highly
 competition in the landscape of exponential population growth. Fresh graduates may  
be deprived
 of the chance to work by  
elderly
  people
,  
thus
 it links to the high rate of unemployment and  
other
 social problems.  
For instance
, in Japan, when the  
government
 executed the labor law that employees retired after 65 years  
old
 since 2015, the unemployment rate in 2017 surged 12% compared to 5% in the previous years.  
Thus
, the  
government
 should consider the extension of employment ages. 
In conclusion
, the essay has maintained an impartial stance due to the  
byzantine
 nature of this issue: on the one hand,  
elderly
 employees are beneficial in  
some
 particular  
jobs
; on the  
other
 hand, the extension of  
working
 ages could deprive the  
job
 opportunities for the youngster, which influenced on social problems.