Some children find some subjects as mathematics and philosophy are too difficult to learn, so some people argue that those subjects should be optional rather than compulsory. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
There is no doubt that some students struggle to learning subjects as mathematics or philosophy. Therefore, it is claimed that pupils ought to choose whether or not to learn them. This essay completely disagree with this statement and will develop a reasoned opinion why these subjects should be taught for all students.
To begin with, mathematics and philosophy are paramount subjects to learn how to develop a normal life. This is because math is present in all aspects of life, everything we do is based on a number. For example, the simply act of buying a product in a supermarket demand a person to sum or multiplicate in order to complete the payment. In addition, learning philosophy is vital to learn how to develop a critically thinking. To illustrate this, in order to discuss a problem, the brain has to analize it in advance, and this is taught in phylosophy.
On the other hand, many people believe that these skills should be optional and schools should promote personalized learning. Hence, pupils could be able to learn and boost different skills depending on their individual abilities. As a consequence, they would be more likely to achieve a higher academic level. For example, if a children strenght is biology, he could be taught this subject in more detail with a personalized plan that boost his knowledge and thus become expert in this field. Despite this attractive benefit of leaving some subjects apart, I think that such as math and philosophy are vital for learning those others. For instance, in the cycle of krebs in biology, is extremely important to know how to multiplicate the number of molecules in order to understand the process.
To conclude, although learning individualized subjects can enhance the level of education of a student, I believe that subjects such as math and phylosophy are paramount for making a proper living.
There is no doubt that
some
students struggle to
learning
subjects
as mathematics or
philosophy
.
Therefore
, it
is claimed
that pupils ought to choose
whether or not
to
learn
them. This essay completely disagree with this statement and will develop a reasoned opinion why these
subjects
should
be taught
for all students.
To
begin
with, mathematics and
philosophy
are paramount
subjects
to
learn
how to develop a normal life. This is
because
math is present in all aspects of life, everything we do
is based
on a number.
For example
, the
simply act
of buying a product in a supermarket demand a person to sum or
multiplicate
in order to complete the payment.
In addition
,
learning
philosophy
is vital to
learn
how to develop a
critically
thinking. To illustrate this, in order to discuss a problem, the brain
has to
analize
it in advance, and this
is taught
in
phylosophy
.
On the other hand
,
many
people
believe that these
skills
should be optional and schools should promote personalized
learning
.
Hence
, pupils could be able to
learn
and boost
different
skills
depending on their individual abilities. As a consequence, they would be more likely to achieve a higher academic level.
For example
, if a children
strenght
is biology, he could
be taught
this
subject
in more detail with a personalized plan that boost his knowledge and
thus
become expert in this field. Despite this attractive benefit of leaving
some
subjects
apart, I
think
that such as math and
philosophy
are vital for
learning
those others.
For instance
, in the cycle of
krebs
in biology, is
extremely
important
to know how to
multiplicate
the number of molecules in order to understand the process.
To conclude
, although
learning
individualized
subjects
can enhance the level of education of a student, I believe that
subjects
such as math and
phylosophy
are paramount for making a proper living.