Smoking has been prohibited inside some companies whereas in few countries it has been totally banned in all the public places. It is agreed that this is an appropriate action because serious consequences of smoking in working areas and in public may lead to fire accidents and heath hazards to self and society.
A strong argument could be put forth that smoking should not be allowed in certain work environments. For instance, if there is a lapse of security in an oil and natural gas company like Indian Oil Corporation, then it has to face the ramifications since the probability for fire accidents becomes higher. So the ban imposed is considered to be a right method not only to thwart the resources from being depleted but also to save the lives of the workers from such disaster.
Moreover, if smoking is banned in all public places of the country then obviously the overall health of the masses would be improved. Since it becomes a legal issue, if they disobey the rules, people might gradually become de-addicted. For illustration, my uncle decided not to smoke in public amenities like bus stops and railway stations instead of paying a huge amount of fine. Naturally, life-threatening diseases like lung cancer and asthma could reduce and the number of passive smokers might also decline. Eventually, the future citizens of the country are made healthier which would be reflected as their efficiency, productivity and enthusiasm thereby paving way for the country's development.
In conclusion, banning smoking either in business sectors or all public places, both are undeniably a wise remedial act because the job environment is made safer and the people are encouraged to lead a healthy lifestyle which in turn contributes to the overall growth of the country. Though smokeless future seems to be skeptical but it could be made possible with joint efforts of all the individuals.
Smoking
has
been prohibited
inside
some
companies
whereas in few
countries
it has been
totally
banned in all the
public
places. It is
agreed
that this is an appropriate action
because
serious consequences of
smoking
in working areas and in
public
may lead to fire accidents and heath hazards to self and society.
A strong argument could
be put
forth that
smoking
should not be
allowed
in certain work environments.
For instance
, if there is a lapse of security in an oil and natural gas
company
like Indian Oil Corporation, then it
has to
face the ramifications since the probability for fire accidents becomes higher.
So
the ban imposed
is considered
to be a right method not
only
to thwart the resources from
being depleted
but
also
to save the
lives
of the workers from such disaster.
Moreover
, if
smoking
is banned
in all
public
places of the
country
then
obviously
the
overall
health of the masses would be
improved
. Since it becomes a legal issue, if they disobey the
rules
,
people
might
gradually
become
de-addicted
. For illustration, my uncle decided not to smoke in
public
amenities like bus
stops
and railway stations
instead
of paying a huge amount of fine.
Naturally
, life-threatening diseases like lung cancer and asthma could
reduce
and the number of passive smokers might
also
decline.
Eventually
, the future citizens of the
country
are made
healthier which would
be reflected
as their efficiency, productivity and enthusiasm thereby paving way for the country's development.
In conclusion
, banning
smoking
either in business sectors or all
public
places, both are
undeniably
a wise remedial act
because
the job environment
is made
safer and the
people
are encouraged
to lead a healthy lifestyle which in turn contributes to the
overall
growth of the
country
. Though smokeless future seems to be skeptical
but
it could
be made
possible with joint efforts of all the individuals.