Nowadays, a large number of individuals tend to disagree with smokers who were smoking in a number of offices owing to the government have made new regulation for a smoker who was smoking in public. This policy was raised due to smoking activity was hazardous for us. In my point of view, the government should be conducted this rule to make a comfort zone for other people.
First and foremost, smoking activity can disturb a number of passive smokers. It has a adverse impact on those who not smoking and be able to affect their health. For instance, in public facilities like in public transportation, an active smoker cannot smoke on the bus when there are women who are pregnant, due to the fact it has drawbacks for women’s baby. Not only that but also the older people who have lung disease will get an adverse impact and their lung condition will be less healthy. Hence, no doubt in the government that aware of this problem by making a new rule of law about the smoking area.
Moreover, in this modern era, an individual who is an active smoker do not aware of other individual their health. They do not have large knowledge about the dangers of smoking activities for the passive smoker. For instance, currently, in Indonesia, there are several smokers who still smoking in public facilities, due to the government do not give education about the negative impacts of smoking and do not give punishment for all the citizens who smoking in public facilities. Consequently, some active smokers still do these activities.
On the other hand, some people argue that smoking activity will be more beneficial for government tax, on the contrary they do not know which smoking has more and more adverse impacts than beneficial impact, and they are going to think that other people have freedom. Ultimately, the government shall give facility like the smoking area for active smoker freedom.
In conclusion, I prefer that smoking activity will be banned in public activities for other people’s freedom.
Nowadays,
a large number of
individuals tend to disagree with smokers
who
were
smoking
in a number of offices owing to the
government
have made new regulation for a smoker
who
was
smoking
in
public
. This policy
was raised
due to
smoking
activity
was hazardous for us. In my point of view, the
government
should
be conducted
this
rule
to
make
a comfort zone for
other
people
.
First
and foremost,
smoking
activity
can disturb a number of passive smokers. It has
a
adverse
impact
on those
who
not
smoking
and be able to affect their health.
For instance
, in
public
facilities like in
public
transportation, an
active
smoker cannot smoke on the bus when there are women
who
are pregnant, due to the fact it has drawbacks for women’s baby. Not
only
that
but
also
the older
people
who
have lung disease will
get
an adverse
impact
and their lung condition will be less healthy.
Hence
, no doubt in the
government
that aware of this problem by making a new
rule
of law about the
smoking
area.
Moreover
, in this modern era, an individual
who
is an
active
smoker do not aware of
other
individual their health. They do not have large knowledge about the
dangers
of
smoking
activities
for the passive smoker.
For instance
,
currently
, in Indonesia, there are several smokers
who
still
smoking
in
public
facilities, due to the
government
do not give education about the
negative
impacts
of
smoking
and do not give punishment for all the citizens
who
smoking
in
public
facilities.
Consequently
,
some
active
smokers
still
do these activities.
On the
other
hand,
some
people
argue that
smoking
activity
will be more beneficial for
government
tax,
on the contrary
they do not know which
smoking
has more and more adverse
impacts
than beneficial
impact
, and they are going to
think
that
other
people
have freedom.
Ultimately
, the
government
shall give facility like the
smoking
area for
active
smoker freedom.
In conclusion
, I prefer that
smoking
activity
will
be banned
in
public
activities
for
other
people’s
freedom.