Some business now say that no one can smoke cigarettes in any of their offices. Some governments have banned smoking in all public. This is good idea hit also takes away some of freedom. Do you agree and disagree? Give reason for your answer
Some business now say that no one can smoke cigarettes in any of their offices. Some governments have banned smoking in all public. This is good idea hit also takes away some of freedom. Do you agree and disagree? Give reason for your answer 7wG2
Nowadays, some individuals tend to disagree with smokers who were smoking in some office owing to the government have made new regulation for smoker who was smoking in public. This policy was rised due to smoking activity was dangerous for us. In my point of view, the government should be conducted this rule to make a comfort zone for other people.
First and foremost, smoking activity can disturb some passive smoker. It has a negative impact on whom not smoking and be able to affect their health. For instance, in the public facilities like in public transportation, an active smoker cannot smoke on the bus when there are women who are pregnant, because it has drawbacks for women’s baby. Not only that but also the older people who have lung disease will get a negative impact and their lung condition will be less healthier. Hence, no doubt for the government that aware of this problem by making a new rule of law about the smoking area.
Moreover, in this modern era, an individual who is an active smoker do not aware of other individual their health. They do not have large knowledge about the dangers of smoking activities for the passive smoker. For instance, currently, in Indonesia, there are several smokers who still smoking in public facilities, due to the government do not give education about the negative impacts of smoking and do not give punishment for all of the citizens who smoking in public facilities. So, some active smokers still do these activities.
On the other hand, some people argue that smoking activity will be more beneficial for government tax, but they do not know which smoking have more and more negative impacts than positive impact and they should think that other people have freedom. Ultimately, the government should give facility like smoking area for active smoker freedom.
In conclusion, I prefer that smoking activity should be banned in public activities for other people’s freedom. 
Nowadays,  
some
 individuals tend to disagree with smokers  
who
 were  
smoking
 in  
some
 office owing to the  
government
 have made new regulation for smoker  
who
 was  
smoking
 in  
public
. This policy was  
rised
 due to  
smoking
  activity
 was  
dangerous
 for us. In my point of view, the  
government
 should  
be conducted
 this  
rule
 to  
make
 a comfort zone for  
other
  people
. 
First
 and foremost,  
smoking
  activity
 can disturb  
some
 passive smoker. It has a  
negative
  impact
 on whom not  
smoking
 and be able to affect their health.  
For instance
, in the  
public
 facilities like in  
public
 transportation, an  
active
 smoker cannot smoke on the bus when there are women  
who
 are pregnant,  
because
 it has drawbacks for women’s baby. Not  
only
 that  
but
  also
 the older  
people
  who
 have lung disease will  
get
 a  
negative
  impact
 and their lung condition will be  
less healthier
.  
Hence
, no  
doubt for
 the  
government
 that aware of this problem by making a new  
rule
 of law about the  
smoking
 area. 
Moreover
, in this modern era, an individual  
who
 is an  
active
 smoker do not aware of  
other
 individual their health. They do not have large knowledge about the  
dangers
 of  
smoking
  activities
 for the passive smoker.  
For instance
,  
currently
, in Indonesia, there are several smokers  
who
  still
  smoking
 in  
public
 facilities, due to the  
government
 do not give education about the  
negative
  impacts
 of  
smoking
 and do not give punishment for  
all of the
 citizens  
who
  smoking
 in  
public
 facilities.  
So
,  
some
  active
 smokers  
still
 do these activities.
On the  
other
 hand,  
some
  people
 argue that  
smoking
  activity
 will be more beneficial for  
government
 tax,  
but
 they do not know which  
smoking
 have more and more  
negative
  impacts
 than  
positive
  impact and
 they should  
think
 that  
other
  people
 have freedom.  
Ultimately
, the  
government
 should give facility like  
smoking
 area for  
active
 smoker freedom. 
In conclusion
, I prefer that  
smoking
  activity
 should  
be banned
 in  
public
  activities
 for  
other
  people’s
 freedom.