Search
Vocabularying
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

Some business now say that no one can smoke cigarettes in any of their offices. Some governments have banned smoking in all public. This is good idea hit also takes away some of freedom. Do you agree and disagree? Give reason for your answer

Some business now say that no one can smoke cigarettes in any of their offices. Some governments have banned smoking in all public. This is good idea hit also takes away some of freedom. Do you agree and disagree? Give reason for your answer 7wG2

Nowadays, some individuals tend to disagree with smokers who were smoking in some office owing to the government have made new regulation for smoker who was smoking in public. This policy was rised due to smoking activity was dangerous for us. In my point of view, the government should be conducted this rule to make a comfort zone for other people. First and foremost, smoking activity can disturb some passive smoker. It has a negative impact on whom not smoking and be able to affect their health. For instance, in the public facilities like in public transportation, an active smoker cannot smoke on the bus when there are women who are pregnant, because it has drawbacks for women’s baby. Not only that but also the older people who have lung disease will get a negative impact and their lung condition will be less healthier. Hence, no doubt for the government that aware of this problem by making a new rule of law about the smoking area. Moreover, in this modern era, an individual who is an active smoker do not aware of other individual their health. They do not have large knowledge about the dangers of smoking activities for the passive smoker. For instance, currently, in Indonesia, there are several smokers who still smoking in public facilities, due to the government do not give education about the negative impacts of smoking and do not give punishment for all of the citizens who smoking in public facilities. So, some active smokers still do these activities. On the other hand, some people argue that smoking activity will be more beneficial for government tax, but they do not know which smoking have more and more negative impacts than positive impact and they should think that other people have freedom. Ultimately, the government should give facility like smoking area for active smoker freedom. In conclusion, I prefer that smoking activity should be banned in public activities for other people’s freedom.

Nowadays, This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
 individuals tend to disagree with smokers You use this word too often, consider replacing it withwhich
who
 were You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfrenziedfanaticaldeliriouszealousenthusiasticcrazed
smoking
 in This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
 office owing to the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpowerministryunionauthoritystaterule
government
 have made new regulation for smoker You use this word too often, consider replacing it withwhich
who
 was You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfrenziedfanaticaldeliriouszealousenthusiasticcrazed
smoking
 in You use this word too often, consider replacing it withurbanmutualciviccivilnationalcommunal
public
. This policy was Possible spelling mistake. Did you mean "rose", the past tense form of the verb 'rise'?roseraisedriserisenrisesrisked
rised
 due to You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfrenziedfanaticaldeliriouszealousenthusiasticcrazed
smoking
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withactionlifeenterpriseexercisemovement
activity
 was This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:hazardousrisky
dangerous
 for us. In my point of view, the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpowerministryunionauthoritystaterule
government
 should be conducted
 this This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :requirement
rule
 to This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :createconstructmanufactureproduce
make
 a comfort zone for You use this word too often, consider replacing it withnewalternativemore
other
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualsnationsociety
people
.

First
 and foremost, You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfrenziedfanaticaldeliriouszealousenthusiasticcrazed
smoking
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withactionlifeenterpriseexercisemovement
activity
 can disturb This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
 passive smoker. It has a You use this word too often, consider replacing it withunfavorableadversepessimisticgloomyweak
negative
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withshockbrunt
impact
 on whom not You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfrenziedfanaticaldeliriouszealousenthusiasticcrazed
smoking
 and be able to affect their health. For instance
, in the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withurbanmutualciviccivilnationalcommunal
public
 facilities like in You use this word too often, consider replacing it withurbanmutualciviccivilnationalcommunal
public
 transportation, an You use this word too often, consider replacing it withoperatingaliveeffective
active
 smoker cannot smoke on the bus when there are women You use this word too often, consider replacing it withwhich
who
 are pregnant, This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:due to the factin light of the fact thatowing to the fact that
because
 it has drawbacks for women’s baby. Not This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exclusively
only
 that This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:on the contrary
but
also
 the older You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withwhich
who
 have lung disease will This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :acquire
get
 a You use this word too often, consider replacing it withunfavorableadversepessimisticgloomyweak
negative
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withshockbrunt
impact
 and their lung condition will be Non-standard use of the comparative or superlative. Did you mean "less healthy"?less healthy
less healthier
. Hence
, no The usual collocation for "doubt" is "in" or "about" not "the". Did you mean "doubt in" or "doubt about"?doubt indoubt about
doubt for
 the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpowerministryunionauthoritystaterule
government
 that aware of this problem by making a new This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :requirement
rule
 of law about the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfrenziedfanaticaldeliriouszealousenthusiasticcrazed
smoking
 area.

Moreover
, in this modern era, an individual You use this word too often, consider replacing it withwhich
who
 is an You use this word too often, consider replacing it withoperatingaliveeffective
active
 smoker do not aware of You use this word too often, consider replacing it withnewalternativemore
other
 individual their health. They do not have large knowledge about the This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :hazardsrisks
dangers
 of You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfrenziedfanaticaldeliriouszealousenthusiasticcrazed
smoking
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withactionlifeenterpriseexercisemovement
activities
 for the passive smoker. For instance
, currently
, in Indonesia, there are several smokers You use this word too often, consider replacing it withwhich
who
still
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfrenziedfanaticaldeliriouszealousenthusiasticcrazed
smoking
 in You use this word too often, consider replacing it withurbanmutualciviccivilnationalcommunal
public
 facilities, due to the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpowerministryunionauthoritystaterule
government
 do not give education about the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withunfavorableadversepessimisticgloomyweak
negative
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withshockbrunt
impacts
 of You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfrenziedfanaticaldeliriouszealousenthusiasticcrazed
smoking
 and do not give punishment for Consider using "all the".all the
all of the
 citizens You use this word too often, consider replacing it withwhich
who
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfrenziedfanaticaldeliriouszealousenthusiasticcrazed
smoking
 in You use this word too often, consider replacing it withurbanmutualciviccivilnationalcommunal
public
 facilities. This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:consequently
So
, This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withoperatingaliveeffective
active
 smokers still
 do these activities.

On the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withnewalternativemore
other
 hand, This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 argue that You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfrenziedfanaticaldeliriouszealousenthusiasticcrazed
smoking
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withactionlifeenterpriseexercisemovement
activity
 will be more beneficial for You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpowerministryunionauthoritystaterule
government
 tax, This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:on the contrary
but
 they do not know which You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfrenziedfanaticaldeliriouszealousenthusiasticcrazed
smoking
 have more and more You use this word too often, consider replacing it withunfavorableadversepessimisticgloomyweak
negative
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withshockbrunt
impacts
 than This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:beneficial
positive
Use a comma before 'and' if it connects two independent clauses (unless they are closely connected and short).impact, and
impact and
 they should This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :reckonassumebelieveconsider
think
 that You use this word too often, consider replacing it withnewalternativemore
other
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 have freedom. Ultimately
, the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpowerministryunionauthoritystaterule
government
 should give facility like You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfrenziedfanaticaldeliriouszealousenthusiasticcrazed
smoking
 area for You use this word too often, consider replacing it withoperatingaliveeffective
active
 smoker freedom.

In conclusion
, I prefer that You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfrenziedfanaticaldeliriouszealousenthusiasticcrazed
smoking
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withactionlifeenterpriseexercisemovement
activity
 should be banned
 in You use this word too often, consider replacing it withurbanmutualciviccivilnationalcommunal
public
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withactionlifeenterpriseexercisemovement
activities
 for You use this word too often, consider replacing it withnewalternativemore
other
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people’s
 freedom. 