Search
Tools
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

Smoking not only harms smokers, but also those who are nearby. Therefore, smoking should be banned in public places. To what extent do you agree or disagree

Smoking not only harms smokers, but also those who are nearby. Therefore, smoking should be banned in public places. 2bQYk

Tobacco smoking not only cause health problems among smokers, on the contrary, also those around them. Hence, people believe that smoking shall not be admissible in social areas. Although there are arguments on both sides. I strongly agree that placing bans will be most actual action. The group standing for, presents reasons why banning is not necessary. Firstly, they said those smoking passively really wished to otherwise, limit coming around smoking zones. For example, football view centers where tobacco is equally sold. In addition, government advertising effects of smoking to humanity yet, has tobacco companies producing on daily basis and distributes to markets supposed be addressed prior to the consumers. For instance, production and supplies be going to slow down to enhance reduction in consumption. However, there are other arguments that support bans. To begin with, it is proven that tobacco contains carcinogenic elements causing ill- health not only to smokers also those seated around are inclusive and the possibility of developing cancer of the lungs, throat, mouth etc is extremely minimal, likewise other body parts. Consequently, it is unfair to impose it to people. For example, statistics of the research conducted in Abia state on August, 2020 showed that the rate of cancers as a result of smoking is increasingly high compared to the previous. More so, government to ban smoking in social centers then create a special area for such. For instance, bans be place on recreational centers. This shall go a long way decreasing rate of passive smoking, thereby improves healthy living. In conclusion, it is clear that tobacco smoking needs be made illegal in public places to promote adequate health status at the same time, increase life span. This is most definitely beneficial development. .

You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcigarettecropsmoking
Tobacco
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfrenziedfanaticaldeliriouszealousenthusiasticcrazed
smoking
 not This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exclusively
only
 cause health problems among smokers, on the contrary
, also
 those around them. Hence
, This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualsnationsociety
people
 believe that You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfrenziedfanaticaldeliriouszealousenthusiasticcrazed
smoking
 shall not be admissible in social areas. Although there are arguments on both sides. I strongly
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :acquiesce
agree
 that placing You use this word too often, consider replacing it withembargorestrictionrefusalinjunctionprohibitionboycott
bans
 will be Did you mean "the most"?the most
most
 actual action.

The group standing for, presents reasons why banning is not necessary. Firstly
, they said those You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfrenziedfanaticaldeliriouszealousenthusiasticcrazed
smoking
passively
really
 wished to otherwise
, limit coming around You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfrenziedfanaticaldeliriouszealousenthusiasticcrazed
smoking
 zones. For example
, football view centers where You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcigarettecropsmoking
tobacco
 is equally
 sold. In addition
, This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :national authoritypublic authority
government
 advertising effects of You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfrenziedfanaticaldeliriouszealousenthusiasticcrazed
smoking
 to humanity yet
, has You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcigarettecropsmoking
tobacco
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :enterprisescorporations
companies
 producing on daily basis and distributes to markets supposed be addressed
 prior to the consumers. For instance
, production and supplies be going to slow down to enhance reduction in consumption.

However
, there are other arguments that support You use this word too often, consider replacing it withembargorestrictionrefusalinjunctionprohibitionboycott
bans
. To This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :initiatecommence
begin
 with, it is proven
 that You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcigarettecropsmoking
tobacco
 contains carcinogenic elements causing ill- health not This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exclusively
only
 to smokers also
 those seated around are inclusive and the possibility of developing cancer of the lungs, throat, mouth etc is extremely
 minimal, likewise
 other body parts. Consequently
, it is unfair to impose it to This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualsnationsociety
people
. For example
, statistics of the research conducted in Possible spelling mistake found.AsiaAriaApiaABAABISAFIA
Abia
 state on When specifying a month and year, the comma is unnecessary: "August 2020".August 2020
August, 2020
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :demonstratedportrayedindicateddisplayed
showed
 that the rate of cancers as a result
 of You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfrenziedfanaticaldeliriouszealousenthusiasticcrazed
smoking
 is increasingly
 high compared to the previous. More This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:consequently
so
, This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :national authoritypublic authority
government
 to You use this word too often, consider replacing it withembargorestrictionrefusalinjunctionprohibitionboycott
ban
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfrenziedfanaticaldeliriouszealousenthusiasticcrazed
smoking
 in social centers then create a special area for such. For instance
, You use this word too often, consider replacing it withembargorestrictionrefusalinjunctionprohibitionboycott
bans
 be place on recreational centers. This shall go a long way decreasing rate of passive You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfrenziedfanaticaldeliriouszealousenthusiasticcrazed
smoking
, thereby This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :ameliorates
improves
 healthy living.

In conclusion
, it is This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :apparent
clear
 that You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcigarettecropsmoking
tobacco
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfrenziedfanaticaldeliriouszealousenthusiasticcrazed
smoking
 needs be made
 illegal in public places to promote adequate health status at the same time, increase life span. This is most definitely beneficial development. Don't put a space before the full stop.
.