Since most information about culture and history can be found on the internet, museums are not needed anymore. To what extent do you agree? v.4
Since most information about culture and history can be found on the internet, museums are not needed anymore. v. 4
Internet today provides vast amount of information from culture and history. Therefore, there is an argument where museums are irrelevant. I utterly disagree with this view as museums offer not only a one kind of experience to the visitors, but also helps the local government of their economy.
To begin with, museums are places for historical artefacts and for some people, observing the actual or clones is a far greater experience than looking at the internet. By being able to touch, feel and at the same time understand the story behind it, gives another kind of experience. For example, the Art Museum of Louvre Italy, where visitors are able to observe the Monalisa, allows a greater appreciation for the art and to the creator itself. This is something that cannot be experienced by searching on the internet.
Additionally, the fees collected from the visitors help the government to maintain the facilities. Consequently, when many visitors visit the place, the surrounding places like restaurant, cafes and souvenir shops gets the benefits of the traffic. One good example is the same art museum in Italy, visitors are able to find nearby food places easily, and many stores around it are selling miniatures and printouts of Monalisa. Therefore, museums are well taken care, it attracts more tourist and boost the local economy due to the traffic it generates.
To conclude, museums still play an important role in the society as it boosts up the local economy and a gives a unique experience to its visitors even though the knowledge can be found on the internet. Given this situation, I personally believe that the government should advocate the importance of museums to protect the culture and the history it tells.
Internet
today
provides vast amount of information from culture and history.
Therefore
, there is an argument where
museums
are irrelevant. I
utterly
disagree with this view as
museums
offer not
only
a one kind of
experience
to the
visitors
,
but
also
helps
the local
government
of their economy.
To
begin
with,
museums
are
places
for historical
artefacts
and for
some
people
, observing the actual or clones is a far greater
experience
than looking at the internet. By being able to touch, feel and at the same time understand the story behind it, gives another kind of
experience
.
For example
, the Art
Museum
of Louvre Italy, where
visitors
are able to observe the
Monalisa
,
allows
a greater appreciation for the art and to the creator itself. This is something that cannot
be experienced
by searching on the internet.
Additionally
, the fees collected from the
visitors
help
the
government
to maintain the facilities.
Consequently
, when
many
visitors
visit the
place
, the surrounding
places
like restaurant,
cafes
and souvenir shops
gets
the benefits of the traffic. One
good
example is the same art
museum
in Italy,
visitors
are able to find nearby food
places
easily
, and
many
stores around it are selling miniatures and printouts of
Monalisa
.
Therefore
,
museums
are well taken care, it attracts more tourist and boost the local economy due to the traffic it generates.
To conclude
,
museums
still
play an
important
role in the society as it boosts up the local economy and
a gives
a unique
experience
to its
visitors
even though
the knowledge can
be found
on the internet.
Given
this situation, I
personally
believe that the
government
should advocate the importance of
museums
to protect the culture and the history it
tells
.
8Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
8Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
8Mistakes