All the nations has undergone significant changes. In the past, to help other nation is much difficult. But nowadays, it becomes more easy and have plenty of ways to do it. There are contrasting perceptions in this matter. Proponents declare that wealthy nation have to help poorer nations by giving them necessary things. Conversely, critics agree that it is the governments duty to take care of their citizens. In this essay, I will discuss both the sides of the arguments and support my views with examples.
Those who believe that wealthy nations have to help poorer nations have interesting reasons to support their belief. The most prominent reason behind their opinion is that developed country can provide education. This view exists because advanced countries can spread awareness about education in developing countries. As a result, people take good education and it will also affect on the growth of the nation. In addition, it is also seen that, some international company open their branch in developing country. Hence, by doing this they provide employment to unemployed people of other nation.
In sharp contrast to the former group, there is a sizeable population against this. One of the most convincing factors they feel is that, government of poorer country also have to provide good necessary things. This factor is taken into account as government have to provide free education. Therefore, more people take education who is not able to pay fees of school and collage.
My decision to support is based on the reason that by getting required things from the wealthy nation, government spend their budget on different matter. My observation is valid due to the fact that, developed countries can help other country by providing them food or any other necessary thing. Hence, developing country can spend their food budget on improving nation's security system.
In conclusion, I believe that it is wealthy nations duty to help poorer nation developing by providing foods or education.
All the
nations
has undergone significant
changes
. In the past, to
help
other
nation
is much difficult.
But
nowadays, it becomes more easy and have
plenty
of ways to do it. There are contrasting perceptions in this matter. Proponents declare that
wealthy
nation
have to
help
poorer
nations
by giving them necessary things.
Conversely
, critics
agree
that it is the
governments
duty to take care of their citizens. In this essay, I will discuss both the sides of the arguments and support my views with examples.
Those who believe that
wealthy
nations
have to
help
poorer
nations
have interesting reasons to support their belief. The most prominent reason behind their opinion is that developed
country
can
provide
education
. This view exists
because
advanced
countries
can spread awareness about
education
in
developing
countries
.
As a result
,
people
take
good
education
and it will
also
affect
on the growth of the
nation
.
In addition
, it is
also
seen
that,
some
international
company
open their branch in
developing
country
.
Hence
, by doing this they
provide
employment to unemployed
people
of
other
nation.
In sharp contrast to the former group, there is a sizeable population against this. One of the most convincing factors they feel is that,
government
of
poorer
country
also
have to
provide
good
necessary things. This factor
is taken
into account as
government
have to
provide
free
education
.
Therefore
, more
people
take
education
who is not able to pay fees of school and collage.
My decision to support
is based
on the reason that by getting required things from the
wealthy
nation
,
government
spend their budget on
different
matter. My observation is valid due to the fact that, developed
countries
can
help
other
country
by providing them food or any
other
necessary thing.
Hence
,
developing
country
can spend their food budget on improving nation's security system.
In conclusion
, I believe that it is
wealthy
nations
duty to
help
poorer
nation
developing
by providing foods or
education
.