Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Should smoking be banned completely ?

Should smoking be banned completely? xOaOb
Since the late 1900s, there have been numerous researches and scientific publications from scientists proving the harms of smoking. What used to be considered a trait of the nobles and intellectuals has now become an unhealthy and often disliked habit. Although there have been arguments suggesting that smoking ought to be strictly prohibited, I find myself teaming up with the opposite side that smoking should not be completely forbidden, but rather be carefully supervised. One of the reasons for me to believe that smoking should not be banned lies in the mental benefits that cigarettes can provide to certain groups of people. Though it cannot be denied that excessive smoking does cause severe problems to smokers’ health, especially their lungs, it is also proven by scientists to have a calming effect for some people who have to suffer from anxiety. This is considered an effective way to relieve stress by inhaling and exhaling a small amount of nicotine, which can sometimes be considered as a type of painkiller, to ease their minds and neuron systems. Another reason to oppose putting an absolute restriction on smoking is the economic value that the tobacco industry brings. The tax rate being put on the tobacco industry is extremely high as governments do not consider this to be an essential commodity. Though being taxed up to 80% of their value, cigarettes are still being highly consumed with thousands and millions of packs being sold every day. The revenue that a tobacco company receives annually is enormous and so is the money they have to pay for all kinds of taxes, which will eventually serve as a part of the national budget. All in all, though I cannot say that smoking does not bring harm to anyone, I still believe that smoking should not be outlawed as it brings not only medical but also economic benefits. Besides, everyone should have freedom of making choices, to smoke or not to smoke, as long as they do not cause the people surrounding them to become passive smokers by doing so in open, public spaces or smoking-restricted areas.
Since the late 1900s, there have been numerous researches and scientific publications from scientists proving the harms of
smoking
. What
used
to
be considered
a trait of the nobles and intellectuals has
now
become an unhealthy and
often
disliked habit. Although there have been arguments suggesting that
smoking
ought to be
strictly
prohibited, I find myself teaming up with the opposite side that
smoking
should not be completely forbidden,
but
rather
be
carefully
supervised.

One of the reasons for me to believe that
smoking
should not
be banned
lies in the mental benefits that cigarettes can provide to certain groups of
people
. Though it cannot
be denied
that excessive
smoking
does cause severe problems to smokers’ health,
especially
their lungs, it is
also
proven by scientists to have a calming effect for
some
people
who
have to
suffer from anxiety. This
is considered
an effective way to relieve
stress
by inhaling and exhaling a
small
amount of nicotine, which can
sometimes
be considered
as a type of painkiller, to
ease
their minds and neuron systems.

Another reason to oppose putting an absolute restriction on
smoking
is the economic value that the tobacco industry brings. The tax rate
being put
on the tobacco industry is
extremely
high as
governments
do not consider this to be an essential commodity. Though
being taxed
up to 80% of their value, cigarettes are
still
being
highly
consumed with thousands and millions of packs
being sold
every day. The revenue that a tobacco
company
receives
annually
is enormous and
so
is the money they
have to
pay for all kinds of taxes, which will
eventually
serve as a part of the national budget.

All in all, though I cannot say that
smoking
does not bring harm to anyone, I
still
believe that
smoking
should not
be outlawed
as it brings not
only
medical
but
also
economic benefits.
Besides
, everyone should have freedom of making choices, to smoke or not to smoke, as long as they do not cause the
people
surrounding them to become passive smokers by doing
so
in open, public spaces or smoking-restricted areas.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Should smoking be banned completely?

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
350 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 6.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts