Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Should people be allowed to keep ancient artifacts that they find,or should be artifacts be put in museums as a part of the nation's heritage?

Should people be allowed to keep ancient artifacts that they find, or should be artifacts be put in museums as a part of the nation's heritage? BL2na
That is interesting but argumentative question. Most people would like to keep and collect artifacts at their home because they take interest in historical items. Some argue that you may keep atrifacts or manusicripts which date back to ancient, if they have been handed down the things through their ancestors or they have made a chance discovery. While others believe that artifacts including manusicripts, sculpture, ancients and religious books and etc. . . should be put in museums as the nation's heritage. I completely agree with the view that because of several reasons. For a star, some people said that they have some causes for not giving artifacts to museums, for instance, the things could have been legancy or sold them. Another point is that if the findings are found in people's own yard or garden, of cource, the thing should be allowed to belong to the family. Thirdly, goverment must allocate funding or set up special bank account for the family in order to recieve the ancient items. The state funding ought to be half cost of the items because the things are excavated in their territory However, these days museums are the most available place to save historical items comparing to past which were only storages. Experts learn the atrifacts then gather data how and when it was made. According to their information, the artifacts are saved in normal temperature on displays. Otherwise, maximum humid temperature will gradually cause the problem of erosion. For example, manusicripts and historical books are delicate and they need carefullness to be a good condition. I think that the best vehicle to keep and be inherited artifacts to hand them over to museums. In conclusion, national heritage is our proud of people, so it belongs to public. Personally I think that artifacts must put in museums so as to inform our offspring about ancestors before altering into a quantity of unnecessary powder.
That is
interesting
but
argumentative question. Most
people
would like to
keep
and collect
artifacts
at their home
because
they take interest in historical items.

Some
argue that you may
keep
atrifacts
or
manusicripts
which date back to ancient, if they have
been handed
down the things through their
ancestors or
they have made a chance discovery. While others believe that
artifacts
including
manusicripts
, sculpture, ancients and religious books
and etc
.
.
.
should
be put
in
museums
as the nation's heritage. I completely
agree
with the view that
because
of several reasons.

For a star,
some
people
said that they have
some
causes for not giving
artifacts
to
museums
,
for instance
, the things could have been
legancy
or sold them. Another point is that if the findings
are found
in
people
's
own
yard or garden, of
cource
, the thing should be
allowed
to belong to the family.
Thirdly
,
goverment
must
allocate funding or set up special bank account for the family in order to
recieve
the ancient items. The state funding ought to be half cost of the items
because
the things
are excavated
in their
territory


However
, these days
museums
are the most available place to save historical items comparing to past which were
only
storages
.

Experts learn the
atrifacts
then gather data how and when it
was made
. According to their information, the
artifacts
are saved
in normal temperature on displays.
Otherwise
, maximum humid temperature will
gradually
cause the problem of erosion.
For example
,
manusicripts
and historical books are
delicate and
they need
carefullness
to be a
good
condition. I
think
that the best vehicle to
keep
and
be inherited
artifacts
to hand them over to museums.

In conclusion
, national heritage is our proud of
people
,
so
it belongs to public.
Personally
I
think
that
artifacts
must
put in
museums
so as to
inform our offspring about ancestors
before
altering into a quantity of unnecessary powder.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Should people be allowed to keep ancient artifacts that they find, or should be artifacts be put in museums as a part of the nation's heritage?

Essay
  American English
6 paragraphs
319 words
5.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 5.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts