Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Should media write about the private lives of celebrities

Should media write about the private lives of celebrities YLw1m
Celebrities are those people who are working in certain occupations, which are directly related to the public interest such as sports, movies, politics, etc. Media is a separate industry, which keeps a track record of the celebrities, related towards their work life as well as their social life, to be presented to the public, as they are keen to know about them. So the question arises whether a celebrity should have a private life or media should interfere in the stars life. Privacy is freedom, which everyone should enjoy. Although celebrities work in different professions for the public, they have their personal life as well, which they dont want to share with the public. Stars are a public figure, but they are not public property. Famous people have families, relations; they do go to the doctor; attend family occasions like ordinary people. Therefore, they too want to enjoy solitude as ordinary people do. For example, wherever celebrities go, paparazzi follow them and forcefully take their pictures, which they hate it because it creates a disturbance. In short, privacy is everybody's right, regardless of occupation. On the other hand, people are impressed by celebrities and are interested in their private life. thus; media interfere in their individual lives to bring news about their personal experience to the public. Lots of media channel runs only on the social and professional growth of celebrities. thats how media works bringing news anyhow to society, to get public attention on their channel. In some cases, in the race of becoming top news, news reporter publishes fake news about celebrities. For example, in recent news, a piece of fake news was spread that a personality died, but actor itself revealed it, that it was fake news. To conclude, celebrities do have a personal life, which shouldn't be published. however, they will be interpreted by media due to public demand to know about them in my opinion, its not justified that media is interfering in celebrities life, as no one has right to interfere in anyone personal life but its the public who compels media to interfere and sometimes media itself publish fake news
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Celebrities
are those
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
who are working in certain occupations, which are
directly
related to the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
public
interest such as sports, movies, politics, etc.
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Media
is a separate industry, which
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
keeps
a
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
track
record of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
celebrities
, related towards their work
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
life
as well
as their social
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
life
, to
be presented
to the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
public
, as they are keen to know about them.
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
So
the question arises whether a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
celebrity
should have a private
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
life
or
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
media
should
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
interfere
in the
Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean "stars'" or "star's"?
stars
life.

Privacy is freedom, which everyone should enjoy. Although
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
celebrities
work in
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
different
professions for the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
public
, they have their
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
personal
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
life
as well
, which they
Possible spelling mistake found
dont
want to share with the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
public
. Stars are a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
public
figure,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
they are not
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
public
property.
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
Famous
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
have families, relations; they do go to the doctor; attend family occasions like ordinary
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
.
Therefore
, they too want to enjoy solitude as ordinary
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
do.
For example
, wherever
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
celebrities
go, paparazzi follow them and
forcefully
take their pictures, which they hate it
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
it creates a disturbance. In short, privacy is everybody's right, regardless of occupation.

On the other hand
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
are impressed
by
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
celebrities
and
are interested
in their private
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
life
.
Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
thus
;
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
media
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
interfere
in their individual
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
lives
to bring
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
news
about their
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
personal
experience to the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
public
. Lots of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
media
channel runs
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
on the social and professional growth of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
celebrities
.
Possible spelling mistake found
thats
how
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
media
works bringing
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
news
anyhow to society, to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
get
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
public
attention on their channel. In
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
cases, in the race of becoming top
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
news
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
news
reporter publishes
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fake
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
news
about
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
celebrities
.
For example
, in recent
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
news
, a piece of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fake
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
news
was spread
that a personality
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
died
,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
actor itself revealed it, that it was
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fake
news.

To conclude
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
celebrities
do have a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
personal
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
life
, which shouldn't
be published
.
This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
however
, they will
be interpreted
by
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
media
due to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
public
demand to know about them

in my opinion, its not justified that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
media
is interfering in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
celebrities
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
life
, as no one has right to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
interfere
in anyone
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
personal
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
life
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
Did you mean "it's" (="it is") instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
its
the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
public
who compels
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
media
to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
interfere
and
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
sometimes
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
media
itself publish
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fake
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
news
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Should media write about the private lives of celebrities

Essay
  American English
5 paragraphs
356 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts