Search
Vocabularying
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

Should healthcare be funded totally by the government for every one?

Should healthcare be funded totally by the government for every one? Dlww7

Nowadays, the question of whether healthcare should be financed by the government or not has been receiving a great deal of public attention. In my opinion, individuals and the government should be jointly responsible for this area. On the one hand, there are several compelling reasons why medical service should be sponsored completely by the government. Firstly, since a vast number of people, especially those who come from impoverished families, would fail to do find the medical costs unaffordable, the financial support of the government in this field would be imperative. In other words, the costs of medication, treatments as well as medical service are prohibitively expensive, which could imply that this support from the authority could save human lives. Secondly, by supporting medical costs, the government could fulfill the responsibility for its citizens. This means that citizens have paid taxes to the national budget, thus they are entitled for basic human services from the government, including the public’s health. On the other hand, it is undeniable that there would be an enormous strain on government budgets if free access to medical care were a right for everyone. Firstly, since using medical services at hospitals is a privilege, not a right, and if people can afford to pay for their services, they should do so. This means that people from rich families could choose innovative and better services in terms of their healthcare, making an unfair to those hard-working and good-conditions citizens when many overexploit the free healthcare system. Secondly, the government is faced with practical decisions on how to allocate their finite budgets. In fact, funding free medical care for everyone would mean less money to spend on pressing issues such as the environment and higher education, leading to the non-comprehensive development of the country. In conclusion, I disagree with the view that the free healthcare system should be a right for everyone in society, and funding should be limited to share the national budget to other fields.

Nowadays, Wordiness: Consider shortening this phrase.whetherthe question whether
the question of whether
 healthcare should be financed
 by the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpowerministryunionauthoritystaterule
government
 or not has been receiving a great deal of public attention. In my opinion, individuals and the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpowerministryunionauthoritystaterule
government
 should be jointly
 responsible for this area.

On the one hand, there are several compelling reasons why You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpharmaceuticaltherapeuticpreventivemedicinal
medical
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withdutyuseofficebusinesssupplyassistance
service
 should be sponsored
 completely by the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpowerministryunionauthoritystaterule
government
. Firstly
, since a vast number of This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualsnationsociety
people
, especially
 those who This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :approacharrive
come
 from impoverished families, would fail to do find the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpharmaceuticaltherapeuticpreventivemedicinal
medical
 costs unaffordable, the financial support of the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpowerministryunionauthoritystaterule
government
 in this field would be imperative. In other words
, the costs of medication, treatments as well
 as You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpharmaceuticaltherapeuticpreventivemedicinal
medical
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withdutyuseofficebusinesssupplyassistance
service
 are prohibitively
 expensive, which could imply that this support from the authority could save human This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :resides
lives
. Secondly
, by supporting You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpharmaceuticaltherapeuticpreventivemedicinal
medical
 costs, the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpowerministryunionauthoritystaterule
government
 could fulfill the responsibility for its citizens. This means that citizens have paid taxes to the national You use this word too often, consider replacing it withallocationtotalaccountcost
budget
, thus
 they are entitled
 for basic human You use this word too often, consider replacing it withdutyuseofficebusinesssupplyassistance
services
 from the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpowerministryunionauthoritystaterule
government
, including the public’s health.

On the other hand
, it is undeniable that there would be an enormous strain on You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpowerministryunionauthoritystaterule
government
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withallocationtotalaccountcost
budgets
 if You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcomplimentary
free
 access to You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpharmaceuticaltherapeuticpreventivemedicinal
medical
 care were a right for everyone. Firstly
, since using You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpharmaceuticaltherapeuticpreventivemedicinal
medical
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withdutyuseofficebusinesssupplyassistance
services
 at hospitals is a privilege, not a right, and if This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualsnationsociety
people
 can afford to pay for their You use this word too often, consider replacing it withdutyuseofficebusinesssupplyassistance
services
, they should do This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:consequently
so
. This means that This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualsnationsociety
people
 from rich families could choose innovative and better You use this word too often, consider replacing it withdutyuseofficebusinesssupplyassistance
services
 in terms of their healthcare, making an unfair to those This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :arduous
hard
-working and This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :beneficialproduct
good
-conditions citizens when This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a plethora ofa number ofnumerous
many
Possible spelling mistake found.over exploit
overexploit
 the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcomplimentary
free
 healthcare system. Secondly
, the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpowerministryunionauthoritystaterule
government
is faced
 with practical decisions on how to allocate their finite You use this word too often, consider replacing it withallocationtotalaccountcost
budgets
. In fact, funding You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcomplimentary
free
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpharmaceuticaltherapeuticpreventivemedicinal
medical
 care for everyone would mean less money to spend on pressing issues such as the environment and higher education, leading to the non-comprehensive development of the country.

In conclusion
, I disagree with the view that the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcomplimentary
free
 healthcare system should be a right for everyone in society, and funding should be limited
 to share the national You use this word too often, consider replacing it withallocationtotalaccountcost
budget
 to other fields. 