Before distributed, many products, such as drugs, pills and make-ups, must be tested so that it can be possible to comprehend how these products affect the human body. Therefore, there has been found an appealing way for the purpose of ensuring that the products are not harmful. In other words, numerous animals have been preferred to be tested to observe all effects of the products. However, even though animal testing is a convenient way to analyze the products, this may not be the best method.
Firstly, the results after the animal tests may seem to guarantee that products are appropriate to be delivered and consumed by the public; nevertheless, it is likely to observe a number of adverse effects which are not seen in animals. In other words, the findings obtained after tests with animals prior to experiments carried out with humans may differ to a considerable degree. Ergo, it can be said that animal tests waste the time of scientists analyzing goods and marketers endeavouring to persuade people to purchase their product due to the test's providing them with erroneous results.
Secondly, other methods in which humans participate in testing products may be selected since the goods tested on animals are eventually consumed by humans. However, that the tests involving humans are regarded as activities able to constitute a grave peril for the participants is a well-known fact. Nonetheless, so as to overcome that problem, the products whose features are wanted to be apparent can be tested on humans without any fear by using some techniques based on micro-dosing. To wit, if the progress of exposing the subjects to the material being tested constitutes a difficulty, the dose can be diminished effortlessly.
It is generally claimed that the number of animals used in tests is not enormous; moreover, animals are suitable for being tested owing to their similarity to humans. However, whether the number of animals used is not tremendous, their being used as subjects of products whose effects are not necessarily known result in researchers miscalculating and examining the tested product incorrectly.
In conclusion, although the use of animals in scientific research may constitute a convenient way, it hurts animals and leads researchers to acquire wrong results. Therefore, even if it is not possible to forbid animal testing entirely, the number of tests is to be reduced.
Before
distributed,
many
products
, such as drugs, pills and
make
-ups,
must
be
tested
so
that it can be possible to comprehend how these
products
affect the
human
body.
Therefore
, there has
been found
an appealing way for the purpose of ensuring that the
products
are not harmful.
In other words
, numerous
animals
have
been preferred
to be
tested
to observe all effects of the
products
.
However
,
even though
animal
testing is a convenient way to analyze the
products
, this may not be the best method.
Firstly
, the results after the
animal
tests
may seem to guarantee that
products
are appropriate to
be delivered
and consumed by the public;
nevertheless
, it is likely to observe a
number
of adverse effects which are not
seen
in
animals
.
In other words
, the findings obtained after
tests
with
animals
prior to experiments carried out with
humans
may differ to a considerable degree. Ergo, it can
be said
that
animal
tests
waste the time of scientists analyzing
goods
and marketers
endeavouring
to persuade
people
to
purchase
their
product
due to the
test
's providing them with erroneous results.
Secondly
, other methods in which
humans
participate in testing
products
may
be selected
since the
goods
tested
on
animals
are
eventually
consumed by
humans
.
However
, that the
tests
involving
humans
are regarded
as activities able to constitute a grave peril for the participants is a well-known fact. Nonetheless,
so as to
overcome that problem, the
products
whose features
are wanted
to be apparent can be
tested
on
humans
without any fear by using
some
techniques based on micro-dosing. To wit, if the progress of exposing the subjects to the material being
tested
constitutes a difficulty, the dose can
be diminished
effortlessly
.
It is
generally
claimed that the
number
of
animals
used
in
tests
is not enormous;
moreover
,
animals
are suitable for being
tested
owing to their similarity to
humans
.
However
, whether the
number
of
animals
used
is not tremendous, their being
used
as subjects of
products
whose effects are not
necessarily
known result in researchers miscalculating and examining the
tested
product
incorrectly
.
In conclusion
, although the
use
of
animals
in scientific research may constitute a convenient way, it hurts
animals
and leads researchers to acquire
wrong
results.
Therefore
, even if it is not possible to forbid
animal
testing
entirely
, the
number
of
tests
is to be
reduced
.