Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Should a city try to preserve its old, historic buildings or destroy them and replace with modern buildings? Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion

Should a city try to preserve its old, historic buildings or destroy them and replace with modern buildings? Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion BRN9
Preserving archaic objects or restoring it with modern substitutes has always been a perplexing dilemma humans had to face from the time immemorial; whatever be the arena. As in every conflicting topic, here also both the parties have a plethora of arguments in favor of their opinions. When it comes to the conservation of historical buildings, it's about the legend and culture of the particular country or region. Every wall and every pillar of the structure has enormous number of tales to tell. It's from those ruins and remnants people unravel the mysteries of past. The cities like Paris, which retain it's old architecture are renowned tourist attractions; the proof that men always yearn for the magnificent legacy which shapes the contemporary world. Yet the other side of the debate is drenched in miseries not in mysteries. The dread of impending dangers hovers over these constructions. The accidents from these establishments in worn out condition, pose as Damocles' sword. In such a case, people prioritize lives over legacy. In short, there are pros and cons to the argument. The finest way will be to find a solution to safeguard the buildings and remodify it in such a way that it doesn't affect it's grandeur and at the same time it can no longer be a threat to the lives of people.
Preserving archaic objects or restoring it with modern substitutes has always been a perplexing dilemma humans had to face from the time immemorial; whatever be the arena. As in every conflicting topic, here
also
both the parties have a plethora of arguments in favor of their opinions. When it
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
comes
to the conservation of historical buildings,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
it's
about the legend and culture of the particular country or region. Every wall and every pillar of the structure has enormous number of tales to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
tell
.
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
It's
from those ruins and remnants
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
unravel the mysteries of past. The cities like Paris, which retain
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
it's
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
old
architecture
are renowned
tourist attractions; the proof that
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
men
always yearn for the magnificent legacy which shapes the contemporary world.
Yet
the other side of the debate
is drenched
in miseries not in mysteries. The dread of impending
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
dangers
hovers over these constructions. The accidents from these establishments in worn out condition, pose as Damocles' sword. In such a case,
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
prioritize
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
lives
over legacy. In short, there are pros and cons to the argument. The finest way will be to find a solution to safeguard the buildings and
Possible spelling mistake found.
remodify
it in such a way that it doesn't affect
Did you mean "its" (possessive pronoun) instead of 'it's' (=it is)?
it's
grandeur and at the same time it can no longer be a threat to the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
lives
of
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
.

IELTS essay Should a city try to preserve its old, historic buildings or destroy them and replace with modern buildings? Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion

Essay
  American English
1 paragraphs
221 words
This writing has been penalized,
text can't be
less than 250 words in Task 2
and less than 150 words in Task 1
4.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • Should a city try to preserve its old, historic buildings or destroy them and replace with modern buildings? Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion