Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Several languages are in danger of extinction because they are spoken by very small numbers of people. Some people say that governments should spend public money on saving these languages, while others believe that would be a waste of money. Discuss both these views and give your opinion.

Several languages are in danger of extinction because they are spoken by very small numbers of people. Some people say that governments should spend public money on saving these languages. While others believe that would be a waste of money. v. 11
There has been a growing trend that some languages will disappear in the future. The topic of whether governments should spend money on protecting them is of great concern to many people. In my view, public money should be used for more important things. There are many reasons why supporters claim minority languages should be preserved. The first one is that each language represents a type of culture which means the culture will disappear with the passing of this language. For instance, in recent decades there has been a decreasing trend of people who can speak the Ewenki language, so the famous Shaman culture is gradually disappearing. Another consideration is that there are a variety of songs, stories and books recorded in some language, so no one can understand this data if nobody knows the language. However, I believe that governments should pay more attention to more important things. Firstly, in order to prevent the loss of these languages, a considerable amount of money has to be used for hiring teachers, building new classrooms and printing relative books. In addition, governments have to invest continuously in maintaining these facilities. Another important reason is that various languages, especially small languages, obstruct the communication of different cultures, and further block the development of trade. The spending that governments use for translating and communication is significantly higher than preserving these languages. So, instead of spending money on saving languages, it's better to just record them completely now. In conclusion, languages inherit certain cultures that will vanish once these languages disappear, but we can save and restore them by spending less money. I support the statement that governments should spend money on others.
There has been a growing trend that
some
languages
will disappear in the future. The topic of whether
governments
should spend
money
on protecting them is of great concern to
many
people
. In my view, public
money
should be
used
for more
important
things.

There are
many
reasons why supporters claim minority
languages
should
be preserved
. The
first
one is that each
language
represents a type of
culture
which means the
culture
will disappear with the passing of this
language
.
For instance
, in recent decades there has been a decreasing trend of
people
who can speak the
Ewenki
language
,
so
the
famous
Shaman
culture
is
gradually
disappearing. Another consideration is that there are a variety of songs, stories and books recorded in
some
language
,
so
no one can understand this data if nobody knows the language.

However
, I believe that
governments
should pay more attention to more
important
things.
Firstly
, in order to
prevent
the loss of these
languages
, a considerable amount of
money
has to
be
used
for hiring teachers, building new classrooms and printing relative books.
In addition
,
governments
have to
invest
continuously
in maintaining these facilities. Another
important
reason is that various
languages
,
especially
small
languages
, obstruct the communication of
different
cultures
, and
further
block the development of trade. The spending that
governments
use
for translating and communication is
significantly
higher than preserving these
languages
.
So
,
instead
of spending
money
on saving
languages
, it's better to
just
record them completely
now
.

In conclusion
,
languages
inherit certain
cultures
that will vanish once these
languages
disappear,
but
we can save and restore them by spending less
money
. I support the statement that
governments
should spend
money
on others.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Several languages are in danger of extinction because they are spoken by very small numbers of people. Some people say that governments should spend public money on saving these languages, while others believe that would be a waste of money.

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
279 words
6.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 6.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 7.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Similar posts