Search
Vocabularying
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

Scientists can increase people’s lifespan to 100 years. Is this a good or bad thing

Scientists can increase people’s lifespan to 100 years. Is this a good or bad thing 70Nnk

Expanding lifespan for a more extended is a significant milestone acquired by scientists. In the modern era, most people expect longevity and happiness in their life. But nobody takes into count its harmful repercussions. However, I personally believe that expanding life for a longer period is not better for the whole world. However, I will discuss both aspects in this essay. On the one hand, the world has limited natural resources that need to survive for living beings; longevity is one of the principal factors of the balance between resources and consumers. Humans are the major consumer of natural resources than other species. If scientists expand the length of the living period of humans. As a result, a critical crisis will arise for acquiring resources between humans and humans and animals. For instance, if it comes true, there will be wars between countries for food and materials. Besides this, another principal issue will arise for space for living owing to the low death rate and high birth rates. The balance is essential for the existence of planet earth. On the other hand, longer life is a delightful prospect for every human being as well as it brings some significant advantages. Time affects everything; if people like scientists and other professionals have a more extended period in their lives, they can convey new inventions to the world that can make life easier. In conclusion, expanding life span has both negative and positive aspects. From my point of view, the advantages of extended life outweigh its drawbacks. Finally, I believe that it's a harmful effect on the whole world.

Expanding lifespan for a more extended is a significant milestone acquired by scientists. In the modern era, most This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualsnationsociety
people
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :anticipate
expect
 longevity and happiness in their You use this word too often, consider replacing it withheartgrowthsoulactivity
life
. This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:on the contrary
But
 nobody takes into count its harmful repercussions. However
, I personally
 believe that expanding You use this word too often, consider replacing it withheartgrowthsoulactivity
life
 for a longer period is not better for the whole You use this word too often, consider replacing it withearthnature
world
. However
, I will discuss both aspects in this essay.

On the one hand, the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withearthnature
world
 has limited natural resources that need to survive for living beings; longevity is one of the principal factors of the balance between resources and consumers. You use this word too often, consider replacing it withbodylifemortalcharacterindividualchild
Humans
 are the major consumer of natural resources than other species. “If” at the beginning of a sentence usually requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
If
 scientists expand the length of the living period of You use this word too often, consider replacing it withbodylifemortalcharacterindividualchild
humans
. As a result
, a critical crisis will arise for acquiring resources between You use this word too often, consider replacing it withbodylifemortalcharacterindividualchild
humans
 and You use this word too often, consider replacing it withbodylifemortalcharacterindividualchild
humans
 and animals. For instance
, if it This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :approachesarrives
comes
 true, there will be wars between countries for food and materials. Besides
 this, another principal issue will arise for space for living owing to the low death rate and high birth rates. The balance is essential for the existence of planet earth.

On the other hand
, longer You use this word too often, consider replacing it withheartgrowthsoulactivity
life
 is a delightful prospect for every You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpersonalanimalmortal
human
 being as well
 as it brings This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
 significant advantages. Time affects everything; if This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualsnationsociety
people
 like scientists and other professionals have a more extended period in their This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :resides
lives
, they can convey new inventions to the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withearthnature
world
 that can This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :createconstructmanufactureproduce
make
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withheartgrowthsoulactivity
life
 easier.

In conclusion
, expanding You use this word too often, consider replacing it withheartgrowthsoulactivity
life
 span has both This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:adverse
negative
 and This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:beneficial
positive
 aspects. From my point of view, the advantages of extended You use this word too often, consider replacing it withheartgrowthsoulactivity
life
 outweigh its drawbacks. Finally
, I believe that it's a harmful effect on the whole
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withearthnature
world
. 