Children’s food promotion is dominated by television advertising, and the
great majority of this promotes the so-called ‘Big Four’ of pre-sugared breakfast cereals, soft-drinks, confectionary and savoury snacks. In the last ten years
advertising for fast food outlets has rapidly increased. There is some evidence
that the dominance of television has recently begun to wane. The importance
of strong, global branding reinforces a need for multi-faceted communications
combining television with merchandising, ‘tie-ins’ and point of sale activity. The
advertised diet contrasts sharply with that recommended by public health
advisors, and themes of fun and fantasy or taste, rather than health and
nutrition, are used to promote it to children. Meanwhile, the recommended diet
gets little promotional support.
There is plenty of evidence that children notice and enjoy food promotion.
However, establishing whether this actually influences them is a
complex problem. The review tackled it by looking at studies that had
examined possible effects on what children know about food, their food
preferences, their actual food behaviour (both buying and eating), and their
health outcomes (eg. obesity or cholesterol levels). The majority of studies
examined food advertising, but a few examined other forms of food
promotion. In terms of nutritional knowledge, food advertising seems to have
little influence on children’s general perceptions of what constitutes a
healthy diet, but, in certain contexts, it does have an effect on more
specific types of nutritional knowledge. For example, seeing soft drink and
cereal adverts reduced primary aged children’s ability to determine
correctly whether or not certain products contained real fruit.
The review also found evidence that food promotion influences children’s
food preferences and their purchase behaviour. A study of primary
school children, for instance, found that exposure to advertising influenced
which foods they claimed to like; and another showed that labelling and
signage on a vending machine had an effect on what was bought by secondary
school pupils. A number of studies have also shown that food advertising can
influence what children eat. One, for example, showed that
advertising influenced a primary class’s choice of daily snack at playtime.
The debate should now shift to what action is needed, and specifically to how the power of commercial marketing can be used to bring about improvements in young people’s eating.
Children’s
food
promotion
is dominated
by television advertising, and the
great majority of this promotes the
so
-called ‘
Big
Four’ of
pre-sugared
breakfast cereals, soft-drinks, confectionary and
savoury
snacks. In the last ten years
advertising for
fast
food
outlets has
rapidly
increased. There is
some
evidence
that the dominance of television has recently begun to wane. The importance
of strong, global branding reinforces a need for multi-faceted communications
combining television with merchandising, ‘tie-ins’ and point of sale activity. The
advertised diet contrasts
sharply
with that recommended by public health
advisors, and themes of fun and fantasy or taste,
rather
than health and
nutrition, are
used
to promote it to
children
. Meanwhile, the recommended diet
gets
little
promotional support.
There is
plenty
of evidence that
children
notice and enjoy
food
promotion.
However
, establishing whether this actually influences them is a
complex problem. The review tackled it by looking at studies that had
examined possible effects on what
children
know about
food
, their food
preferences, their actual
food
behaviour
(both buying and eating), and their
health outcomes (
eg.
obesity or cholesterol levels). The majority of studies
examined
food
advertising,
but
a few examined other forms of food
promotion. In terms of nutritional knowledge,
food
advertising seems to have
little
influence on
children’s
general perceptions of what constitutes a
healthy diet,
but
, in certain contexts, it does have an effect on more
specific types of nutritional knowledge.
For example
, seeing soft drink and
cereal adverts
reduced
primary aged
children’s
ability to determine
correctly
whether or not
certain products contained real fruit.
The review
also
found evidence that
food
promotion influences children’s
food preferences and their
purchase
behaviour
. A study of primary
school
children
,
for instance
, found that exposure to advertising influenced
which
foods
they claimed to like; and another
showed
that labelling and
signage on a vending machine had an effect on what was
bought
by secondary
school pupils. A number of studies have
also
shown that
food
advertising can
influence what
children
eat. One,
for example
,
showed
that
advertising influenced a primary
class
’s choice of daily snack at playtime.
The debate should
now
shift to what action
is needed
, and
specifically
to how the power of commercial marketing can be
used
to bring about improvements in young
people
’s eating.