Nowadays mobile phone is part of most people’s life. At the initial, the only function of mobile phone is make a call. While, in the present day, it is produced with plenty of function. Numerous said, it is undeniable that mobile phone had already become an important part of human, and we need those devices. In contrast, other group of people have an idea of restriction in ownership of mobile phones to those who significantly need it.
Let’s begin with those who agree with restriction. The idea of restriction is focus on people who less likely to use portable telephone in their life. There are severals research present the disadvantages of let youth and teen spend too much time with their own or even parent’s mobile. Furthermore, overuse of mobile phone had responsibility in plenty road accidents. In addition, concerning of global warming, large number of people have own more than only one mobile phones, consequent in expansion of production line and unleash tons of carbon. Restriction of device ownership can reduce these problems.
Moving anti-restriction. These portable device is useful for people to live their life. Make a call or leave a message is convenient for office working. Also, part of human have separately use two different phone with their work and personal lives. Finally, in the era of smartphones, plentiful of financial function can reduce cost of using paper or transportation.
From my point of view, The ownership cannot be restriction because human have a free will. Alternatively, Campaign of “Responsibility in owing the device” is better than restriction.
Nowadays mobile
phone
is part of most
people’s
life. At the initial, the
only
function of mobile
phone
is
make
a call. While, in the present day, it
is produced
with
plenty
of function. Numerous said, it is undeniable that mobile
phone
had already become an
important
part of human, and we need those
devices
.
In contrast
, other group of
people
have an
idea
of
restriction
in ownership of mobile
phones
to those who
significantly
need it.
Let
’s
begin
with those who
agree
with
restriction
. The
idea
of
restriction
is focus on
people
who less likely to
use
portable telephone in their life. There are
severals
research present the disadvantages of
let
youth and teen spend too much time with their
own
or even parent’s mobile.
Furthermore
, overuse of mobile
phone
had responsibility in
plenty
road accidents.
In addition
, concerning of global warming, large number of
people
have
own
more than
only
one mobile
phones
, consequent in expansion of production line and unleash tons of carbon.
Restriction
of
device
ownership can
reduce
these problems.
Moving anti-restriction. These portable
device
is useful for
people
to
live
their life.
Make
a call or
leave
a message is convenient for office working.
Also
, part of human have
separately
use
two
different
phone
with their work and personal
lives
.
Finally
, in the era of smartphones, plentiful of financial function can
reduce
cost of using paper or transportation.
From my point of view, The ownership cannot be
restriction
because
human have a free will.
Alternatively
, Campaign of “Responsibility in owing the
device”
is better than
restriction
.