Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Reducing global environmental damage should be handled by the government rather than individuals

Reducing global environmental damage should be handled by the government rather than individuals 8grOr
It is not hard to find natural degradation nowadays. Damages such as deforestation, plastic, and air pollution are all caused by mankind. However, when it comes to the question of who is the appropriate body that should take action against these issues, people point fingers at either the government or themselves. While there are plausible views from the contrary view, I will argue that it is better for the authority to take default responsibility in this case. Firstly, devastation to the environment is not an easy problem to solve, and most individuals do not have the knowledge or the willingness to take action. For example, in the case of global warming- we did believe we had the chance to stop it but as time went by with only a few activists trying to warn the others, we are now too late to completely end global warming. In Europe and North America, environmental activists started to warn the public of there being only “12 more years remaining to save the future”. The idea of “time running out” is now gaining increasing salience. Contrasting this view, responsibility for solving the problem of environmental damage should come mainly from the government due to the fact the authority to create, pass and implement laws to be followed by the public are all controlled by them. For instance, Japan has a modal shift in national policy to invest more in pollution control technology and educating both the public and business communities. If the government will not strictly impose these kinds of laws, individuals will not feel responsible to take action in reducing activities that lead to environmental pollution. To conclude, I believe that the role of the government is vital to reduce environmental harm by implementing nature-friendly laws and educating their residents. As much as being aware of the damages we are causing is an appreciable factor for us individuals, it is not enough, and we are not taking action collectively. However, It is hoped that we can save our future before it is too late.
It is not
hard
to find natural degradation nowadays. Damages such as deforestation, plastic, and air pollution are all caused by mankind.
However
, when it
comes
to the question of who is the appropriate body that should take
action
against these issues,
people
point fingers at either the
government
or themselves. While there are plausible views from the contrary view, I will argue that it is better for the authority to take default responsibility
in this case
.

Firstly
, devastation to the environment is not an easy problem to solve, and most individuals do not have the knowledge or the willingness to take
action
.
For example
, in the case of global warming- we did believe we had the chance to
stop
it
but
as time went by with
only
a few activists trying to warn the others, we are
now
too late to completely
end
global warming. In Europe and North America,
environmental
activists
started
to warn the public of there being
only
“12 more years remaining to save the future”. The
idea
of “time running out” is
now
gaining increasing salience.

Contrasting this view, responsibility for solving the problem of
environmental
damage should
come
mainly
from the
government
due to the fact the authority to create, pass and implement laws to
be followed
by the public are all controlled by them.
For instance
, Japan has a modal shift in national policy to invest more in pollution control technology and educating both the public and business communities. If the
government
will not
strictly
impose these kinds of laws, individuals will not feel responsible to take
action
in reducing activities that lead to
environmental
pollution.

To conclude
, I believe that the role of the
government
is vital to
reduce
environmental
harm by implementing nature-friendly laws and educating their residents. As much as being aware of the damages we are causing is an appreciable factor for us individuals, it is not
enough
, and we are not taking
action
collectively
.
However
, It
is hoped
that we can save our future
before
it is too late.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Reducing global environmental damage should be handled by the government rather than individuals

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
341 words
6.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 6.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 7.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts
  • 5band
    What are the disadvantages and advantages related to people living in different places or staying in one place.
    In the past people usually stayed in one place throughout their life. These days people often move around. They often live in several different places in their lifetime. Of course there are advantages and disadvantages of both. Let’s look at them. First of all, people who stayed in one place throug...
  • 6.5band
    Should sugary products be more expensive?
    Numerous products cause health problem nowadays, which contains high-level of sugars making some people believe that the prices should increase for the benefit of the majority. In my opinion, health should always come first before one’s satisfaction specifically in sugary foods and drinks. Therefore...
  • 6.5band
    Should sugary foods and drinks be more expensive?
    Numerous products cause health problem nowadays, which contains high-level of sugars making some people believe that the prices should increase for the benefit of the majority. In my opinion, health should always come first before one’s satisfaction specifically in sugary foods and drinks. Therefore...
  • 6band
    Governments should spend money rather than roads. What extend do you agree
    In this day and age, in order to catch up with the times, the governments have to upgrade their countries' infrastructure. Indeed, money is an indepensable need for their purposes. Railways has irrefutably become common in daily life, but in my viewpoint, spending money on road systems is more essen...
  • 6band
    Ethical and legal issues of surrogate pregnancy
    Motherhood is the most beautiful and divine gift to a woman. Every woman has a dream and a natural instinct that she will become a mother and nurture a baby. Unfortunately for some couples fulfilling this dream becomes impossible due to medical reasons. In such cases, the concept of surrogacy has ev...
  • 6band
    As global population is increasing and And providing food to such a myriad number
    As global population is increasing and And providing food to such a myriad number of individuals has become a burgeoning issue. . A numerous people believe that genetically modified food is the only way to feed the globe. I partially agree with the said notion. This essay is going to articulate both...





Get more results for topic: