Search
Tools
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

Governments should spend money rather than roads. What extend do you agree

Governments should spend money rather than roads. What extend do you agree 1np6y

In this day and age, in order to catch up with the times, the governments have to upgrade their countries' infrastructure. Indeed, money is an indepensable need for their purposes. Railways has irrefutably become common in daily life, but in my viewpoint, spending money on road systems is more essential than on the railways on account of these following reasons. On the one hand, it is undeniable that the railways should be built more as it is fast and convenient for transporting as well as travelling. In developing countries, for instance, Japan and the USA, the number of train passengers has recently increased. Instead of travelling by plane, more people tend to choose the rail since the tickets for it are much more cheaper than for plane. On the other hand, I would support my view that money should be spent on roads. Firstly, the majority of means of transport move on roads while the railways are particularly used for trains. That means the highways has more potential to go down than the railways. There will be pot-holes, marshes which make the ways on roads more dangerous to go. Therefore, the roads have to be repaired annually so as to guarantee the citizens' safety. Furthermore, the rail can contain a large number of both traders and citizens, so it leads to overcrowding inside. Some passengers do not have seats and they have to stand for such a long time. It is sometimes uncomfortable to travel by rails. Beside that, more people use their own vehicles or cars to travel comfortably. To put it in a nutshell, the road systems usually play a vital and never-ending role in society although the railways are developing day by day. Money has to be spent in an accurate way and purpose by the governments to modernize their countries.

In this day and age, in order to catch up with the times, the This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :national authoritiespublic authorities
governments
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:ought to
have to
 upgrade their countries' infrastructure. Indeed
, You use this word too often, consider replacing it withsalarywagewealthpaybillcash
money
 is an Possible spelling mistake found.indispensableindefensibleundependable
indepensable
 need for their purposes. Possible agreement error. You should probably use: "railway has".Railway has
Railways has
irrefutably
 become common in daily life, This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:on the contrary
but
 in my viewpoint, spending You use this word too often, consider replacing it withsalarywagewealthpaybillcash
money
 on You use this word too often, consider replacing it withroadwaylaneboulevardthoroughfarecoursetrack
road
 systems is more essential than on the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withtracklinerail line
railways
 on account of these following reasons.

On the one hand, it is undeniable that the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withtracklinerail line
railways
 should be built
 more Comparison requires "than", not 'then' nor 'as'.than
as
 it is This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:quickrapidswiftprompt
fast
 and convenient for transporting as well
 as travelling. In This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :Third World countrieslow-income countries
developing countries
, for instance
, Japan and the USA, the number of train passengers has recently increased. Instead
 of travelling by This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:aircraft
plane
, more This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualsnationsociety
people
 tend to choose the rail since the tickets for it are much Use only "cheaper" (without 'more') when you use the comparative.cheaper
more cheaper
 than for This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:aircraft
plane
.

On the other hand
, I would support my view that You use this word too often, consider replacing it withsalarywagewealthpaybillcash
money
 should be spent
 on You use this word too often, consider replacing it withroadwaylaneboulevardthoroughfarecoursetrack
roads
. Firstly
, the majority of means of transport This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :relocate
move
 on You use this word too often, consider replacing it withroadwaylaneboulevardthoroughfarecoursetrack
roads
 while the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withtracklinerail line
railways
 are particularly
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exploited
used
 for trains. That means the highways has more potential to go down than the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withtracklinerail line
railways
. There will be pot-holes, marshes which This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :createconstructmanufactureproduce
make
 the ways on You use this word too often, consider replacing it withroadwaylaneboulevardthoroughfarecoursetrack
roads
 more This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:hazardousrisky
dangerous
 to go. Therefore
, the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withroadwaylaneboulevardthoroughfarecoursetrack
roads
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:ought to
have to
be repaired
annually
'So as to' expresses purpose and is used in formal texts. Consider using "to"to
so as to
 guarantee the citizens' safety.

Furthermore
, the rail can contain Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use "many" or "numerous"manynumerous
a large number of
 both traders and citizens, This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:consequently
so
 it leads to overcrowding inside. This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
Some
 passengers do not have Use a comma before 'and' if it connects two independent clauses (unless they are closely connected and short).seats, and
seats and
 they This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:ought to
have to
 stand for such a long time. It is This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :in some instances
sometimes
 uncomfortable to travel by rails. Beside that, more This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualsnationsociety
people
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exploit
use
 their This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :possess
own
 vehicles or cars to travel comfortably
.

To put it in a nutshell, the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withroadwaylaneboulevardthoroughfarecoursetrack
road
 systems usually
 play a vital and never-ending role in society although the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withtracklinerail line
railways
 are developing day by day. You use this word too often, consider replacing it withsalarywagewealthpaybillcash
Money
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:oughts to
has to
be spent
Consider replacing "in an accurate way" with the adverb for "accurate"; e.g., "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
in an accurate way
 and purpose by the This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :national authoritiespublic authorities
governments
 to modernize their countries. 