It is irrefutable to say, with the world moving toward cheaper and easy accessible objects, waste production has rocketed. Question is why people are not concerned about the deteriorating effect of the non-recycling waste, or they will only follow a track of recycling if the harsh rule is implied. In the following essay i will be discussing about the negative effects of non recycling and things a governing body can do to make it possible.
To begin with, it is always a better option to re use a thing than buying a new product. From saving a financial burden to a clean environment, there are only the positive aspect of recycling. One of the myriad positive aspects is, by recycling we are conserving nature, and there are many product that can be recycled which we lagging at. For instance, according to New York Times, by 2050 the number of plastics in the oceans will triple and will be causing detrimental effect on the marine life.
Moreover the detrimental effect can only be controlled if the strict laws against recycling are implemented. Plastic, for example are the significant cause of pollution in many countries, and colossal of metropolitan have used the rule to recycle most of the product, however the difficult situation prevails in the poorer nations. Any plan made in the path of conservation nature and reuse and recycle is smaller, so we have to make recycling aor ut most goal and move forward in the path of recycling.
To recapitulate, the most significant problem the world is facing is the recycling of the product and governing bodies, concerned authorities should treat this problem with utmost care as the next generation is in their hand and preserving, conserving and recycling is the only thing we can do to the preserve the world nature.
It is irrefutable to say, with the world moving toward cheaper and easy accessible objects, waste production has rocketed. Question is why
people
are not concerned about the deteriorating
effect
of the non-recycling waste, or they will
only
follow a
track
of
recycling
if the harsh
rule
is implied
. In the following essay
i
will be
discussing about the
negative
effects of non
recycling
and things a governing body can do to
make
it possible.
To
begin
with, it is always a better option to re
use
a thing than buying a new
product
. From saving a financial burden to a clean environment, there are
only
the
positive
aspect
of
recycling
. One of the myriad
positive
aspects is, by
recycling
we are conserving nature, and there are
many
product
that can
be recycled
which
we lagging
at.
For instance
, according to New York Times, by 2050 the number of plastics in the oceans will triple and will be causing detrimental
effect
on the marine life.
Moreover
the detrimental
effect
can
only
be controlled
if the strict laws against
recycling
are implemented
. Plastic,
for example
are the significant cause of pollution in
many
countries, and colossal of metropolitan have
used
the
rule
to recycle most of the
product
,
however
the difficult situation prevails in the poorer nations. Any plan made in the path of conservation nature and reuse and recycle is smaller,
so
we
have to
make
recycling
aor
ut
most goal and
move
forward in the path of recycling.
To recapitulate, the most significant problem the world is facing is the
recycling
of the
product
and governing bodies, concerned authorities should treat this problem with utmost care as the
next
generation is in their hand and preserving, conserving and
recycling
is the
only
thing we can do to the preserve the world nature.