Reading with beleives and writing ✍

of the reading believes that there is an origin for the Voynich manuscript and provides three theories of support. However, the lecturer rejects the claim made in the reading, casting doubt on all the three theories presented in the passage. First, the author claims that there is some complex and secret scientific or magical information in this book that has been written by Anthony Ascham. This point is challenged by the lecturer. He says that this information is so important, but Ascham wrote any original ideas. Hence, this book has not written by Ascham. Second, the author states that this book is a fake book and the text is meaningless. The lecturer rebuts this. He argues that this book is really like a real book. He elaborates on this by mentioning that if this book had been a fake book, there would not have so many complexities in context and could be simpler rather than present condition. Finally, the author of the reading points out that the manuscript is a kind of contemporary fake written by Wilfrid M Voyanich. The lecturer, on the other hand, says that the inks that have been used in the book belong to at least four hundred years ago. He puts forth the idea that this manuscript has been created before the Voynich's birth