Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Reading with beleives and writing ✍

Reading with beleives and writing ✍ Bw6Ma
of the reading believes that there is an origin for the Voynich manuscript and provides three theories of support. However, the lecturer rejects the claim made in the reading, casting doubt on all the three theories presented in the passage. First, the author claims that there is some complex and secret scientific or magical information in this book that has been written by Anthony Ascham. This point is challenged by the lecturer. He says that this information is so important, but Ascham wrote any original ideas. Hence, this book has not written by Ascham. Second, the author states that this book is a fake book and the text is meaningless. The lecturer rebuts this. He argues that this book is really like a real book. He elaborates on this by mentioning that if this book had been a fake book, there would not have so many complexities in context and could be simpler rather than present condition. Finally, the author of the reading points out that the manuscript is a kind of contemporary fake written by Wilfrid M Voyanich. The lecturer, on the other hand, says that the inks that have been used in the book belong to at least four hundred years ago. He puts forth the idea that this manuscript has been created before the Voynich's birth
of
the reading believes that there is an origin for the
Voynich
manuscript and provides three theories of support.
However
, the
lecturer
rejects the claim made in the reading, casting doubt on all the three theories presented in the passage.

First
, the author claims that there is
some
complex and secret scientific or magical information in this
book
that has
been written
by Anthony
Ascham
. This point
is challenged
by the
lecturer
. He says that this information is
so
important
,
but
Ascham
wrote any original
ideas
.
Hence
, this
book
has not written by
Ascham
.

Second, the author states that this
book
is a fake
book
and the text is meaningless. The
lecturer
rebuts this. He argues that this
book
is
really
like a real
book
. He elaborates on this by mentioning that if this
book
had been a fake
book
, there would not have
so
many
complexities in context and could be simpler
rather
than present condition.

Finally
, the author of the reading points out that the manuscript is a kind of contemporary fake written by
Wilfrid
M
Voyanich
. The
lecturer
,
on the other hand
, says that the inks that have been
used
in the
book
belong to at least four hundred years ago. He puts forth the
idea
that this manuscript has
been created
before
the
Voynich
's
birth
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Reading with beleives and writing ✍

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
218 words
This writing has been penalized,
text can't be
less than 250 words in Task 2
and less than 150 words in Task 1
5.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts