Some believer thinks wider open space in newly build school is essential, It has both pros and cons. Before expressing my opinion, both views need to be discussed, so in further paragraph both aspects are discussed thoroughly.
Firstly, fraction of thinkers argues that for sustainable development of child growth it is necessary to have a wider area in institutions, where they can play and do extra curricular activities which leads to their better mental and physical health. Scientifically it has been proved that when the upbringing of the child is healthy the they perform better in the future. Secondly, It provides an abundant field for all students to enjoy their free time along with that they get time to spend moments in the grasp of nature. Additionally, It is believed that in wider area there air quality is purer rather than cosy areas as air passes fluently and frequently in an open location.
On the contrary, It is very hard to arrange large open zone for the construction in a metropolitan city. For instance, recently a magazine published an article which stated that day by day vacant space is diminishing rapidly which can cause a great danger for future generation. At the time of urbanization the cost of area is too much high that an owner of institution compromises with the territory. It is also believed that if the area is big then maintenance charge also increases as well as the responsibility of the faculty to manage students which they think of as a burden. Moreover, Management gets less territory to utilize in the construction which leads to loss in revenue.
To conclude, it can be said that the advantages outweigh the disadvantages. In my opinion development of young ones cannot be compromised due to the high expenses of the organization so the wider open arena is required in newly build education centres.
Some
believer
thinks
wider
open
space in
newly
build school is essential, It has both pros and cons.
Before
expressing my opinion, both views need to
be discussed
,
so
in
further
paragraph both aspects
are discussed
thoroughly
.
Firstly
, fraction of thinkers argues that for sustainable development of child growth it is necessary to have a
wider
area
in institutions, where they can play and do
extra curricular
activities which leads to their better mental and physical health.
Scientifically
it has
been proved
that when the upbringing of the child is healthy
the they
perform better in the future.
Secondly
, It provides an abundant field for all students to enjoy their free time along with that they
get
time to spend moments in the grasp of nature.
Additionally
, It
is believed
that in
wider
area
there air quality is purer
rather
than
cosy
areas
as air passes
fluently
and
frequently
in an
open
location.
On the contrary
, It is
very
hard
to arrange large
open
zone for the construction in a metropolitan city.
For instance
, recently a magazine published an article which stated that day by day vacant space is diminishing
rapidly
which can cause a great
danger
for future generation. At the time of urbanization the cost of
area
is too much high that an owner of institution compromises with the territory. It is
also
believed that if the
area
is
big
then maintenance charge
also
increases
as well
as the responsibility of the faculty to manage students which they
think
of as a burden.
Moreover
, Management
gets
less territory to utilize in the construction which leads to loss in revenue.
To conclude
, it can
be said
that the advantages outweigh the disadvantages. In my opinion development of young ones cannot
be compromised
due to the high expenses of the organization
so
the
wider
open
arena
is required
in
newly
build education
centres
.
7.5Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
7.5Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
7.5Mistakes