Some people believe that public zoos have no application and there is no suitable environment in it. However, other people believe that suits are made for recreation of animals and educational purposes. I totally agree that keeping zoos have no significant benefits.
To begin with, animals looks more beautiful in forests rather than in cage. Firstly, animals lost their freedom because away from natural habitat, they have to eat food which is provided by by zoos authority. Secondly, certain creature loose their powers in cages while animals who living in wild area have more stamina. Thirdly, because of zoos, food chain breaks which important in evolution of species.
In addition, certain types of animals living in their group but in zoos, they have to live solo in cage and adapt their life according to authorities. For instance, elephants like to live in crowd but because of the zoos they can't able to live in groups. Furthermore, environment provide by authorities is not suitable for some species.
On the other side, public zoos have certain pros. Firstly, people can know about different species and their characteristics which is useful for educational purposes. Secondly, some animals are near to the extinction but keeping reserve in zoos and it prevent animals to extinct. For instance, white tigers were nearly to extinct but by reserving them it were saved.
In conclusion, it is clear that drawbacks of keeping zoos is outweighs the advantages. So, i totally agree to public zoos have no useful purposes and animals should deserve to be loved in forests where they belong.
Some
people
believe that public zoos have no application and there is no suitable environment in it.
However
, other
people
believe that suits
are made
for recreation of
animals
and educational purposes. I
totally
agree
that keeping zoos have no significant benefits.
To
begin
with,
animals
looks more
beautiful
in forests
rather
than in cage.
Firstly
,
animals
lost their freedom
because
away from natural habitat, they
have to
eat food which
is provided
by by
zoos
authority.
Secondly
, certain creature
loose
their powers in cages while
animals
who living in wild area have more stamina.
Thirdly
,
because
of zoos, food chain breaks which
important
in evolution of species.
In addition
, certain types of
animals
living in their group
but
in zoos, they
have to
live
solo in cage and adapt their life according to authorities.
For instance
, elephants like to
live
in crowd
but
because
of the zoos they can't able to
live
in groups.
Furthermore
, environment provide by authorities is not suitable for
some
species.
On the other side, public zoos have certain pros.
Firstly
,
people
can know about
different
species and their characteristics which is useful for educational purposes.
Secondly
,
some
animals
are near to the extinction
but
keeping reserve in zoos and it
prevent
animals
to extinct.
For instance
, white tigers were
nearly
to extinct
but
by reserving them it
were saved
.
In conclusion
, it is
clear
that drawbacks of keeping zoos is outweighs the advantages.
So
,
i
totally
agree
to public zoos have no useful purposes and
animals
should deserve to be
loved
in forests where they belong.