Search
Vocabularying
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking
1. Latest Topics
2. Speaking Club

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

Protect the wild animals is waste of resources

Protect the wild animals is waste of resources N8E3b

Nowadays, same people believe that it is pointless keep from wild animals and spend money a lot for them. Because, they think that, they are undomesticated and dangerous in order that, there is no necessity for menkind. However, personally I disagree with this statement for a number of reasons. First of all, wild animals are known as a rare animal all over the world and more people argue that it is perilous to live with them. But, there are several reasons which is important for our environment, medicine and society. For example, rainforests produce oxygen, obserb carbon dioxide and stabilize the earth climate. If humans protect this animal's areas they will also maintain the natural of life. Moreover, they help to develop medical advances. To illustrate, the number of researchers clarify how to treat and cure some hard diseases, such as tuberculosis, polio or diabetes with the help of wild animals. As well as, they make new medicine, which is profitable health of humanity. On the other hand, protection of wild animals and waste of resources are also available for society to collect the money. Precisely, there are veriaty of wild animals in the world and it is interesting for most individuals seeing this unusual animals. Therefore, there are special places to keep them like zoo and small forests in every country. After that, people prefer to visit this kind of places for pleasure, due to this it is easy to earn the money through local and foreign visitors for government treasure. In sum up, haw animals can not be dangerous, they are valuable for nature and I completely disagree with that extinction of wild animals in Earth.

Nowadays, same This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualsnationsociety
people
 believe that it is pointless This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :retain
keep
 from wild You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
 and spend money a lot for them. This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:due to the factin light of the fact thatowing to the fact that
Because
, they This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :reckonassumebelieveconsider
think
 that, they are undomesticated
 and This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:hazardousrisky
dangerous
 in order that, there is no necessity for Possible spelling mistake found.mankindmen kind
menkind
. However
, personally
 I disagree with this statement for a number of reasons. This phrase is redundant. Consider using "first".First
First of all
, wild You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
are known
 as a rare You use this word too often, consider replacing it withnaturalbodily
animal
 all over the world and more This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualsnationsociety
people
 argue that it is perilous to This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :reside
live
 with them. This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:on the contrary
But
, there are several reasons which is This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:vitalcriticalessential
important
 for our environment, medicine and society. For example
, rainforests produce oxygen, Possible spelling mistake found.observeabsorbSerbobsessOsbert
obserb
 carbon dioxide and stabilize the earth climate. “If” at the beginning of a sentence usually requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
If
 humans protect this animal's areas they will also
 maintain the natural of life. Moreover
, they This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :assistassistance
help
 to develop medical advances. To illustrate, the number of researchers clarify how to treat and cure This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :arduous
hard
 diseases, such as tuberculosis, polio or diabetes with the This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :assistassistance
help
 of wild You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
. As well
 as, they This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :createconstructmanufactureproduce
make
 new medicine, which is profitable health of humanity.

On the other hand
, protection of wild You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
 and waste of resources are also
 available for society to collect the money. Precisely
, there are Possible spelling mistake found.verity
veriaty
 of wild You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
 in the world and it is interesting for most individuals seeing this unusual You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
. Therefore
, there are special places to This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :retain
keep
 them like zoo and This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:tiny
small
 forests in every country. After that, This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualsnationsociety
people
 prefer to visit this kind of places for pleasure, due to this it is easy to earn the money through local and foreign visitors for This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :national authoritypublic authority
government
 treasure. In sum up, haw You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
 can not be This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:hazardousrisky
dangerous
, they are valuable for nature and I completely disagree with that extinction of wild You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
 in Earth. 