Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

products to ensure equal accessibility rather than wasting funds over brand commercials.

products to ensure equal accessibility rather than wasting funds over brand commercials. yXmnJ
Few inhabitants have considered that trading agencies ought to enhance the production of more durable products, whilst the rest opine that such firms should generate inexpensive goods. Undoubtedly, long-lasting commodities leave a positive impression over the consumers; however, in my perspective, masses from many developing nations may not be able to afford exorbitant wares. These arguments need proper scrutinization before forming any opinion. To set in, a myriad of agencies have launched brand new products every year with the maximum longevity of goods. Besides this, nowadays many companies deal with more sophisticated products, which not only provide the guarantee but also confer offers to complete refund on products when the consumers not get satisfied with new commodities. Even though the sky high prices of goods, buyers find the new belongings worthy due to the qualities of them. For example, Apple computer company attracts millions of customers each year with the productiveness and reliability of its products. Proceeding further, an array of citizens from poverty stricken backgrounds are not able to afford such expensive commodities. Also, the huge amount of money is spent by manufacturing companies over new goods to gimmick the general public to buy the costly goods which may not absolutely be necessary for daily use. Despite the durability of costly products, all other functions can efficiently be performed by cheaper wares and masses find them more convenient and pocket friendly. For instance, according to an article published by The New York Times, around 75% of inhabitants are reliable on reasonable goods due to similar performance of product with lavish one. In conclusion, although the durability of commodities leaves an imprint over the minds of people with their long-term use yet many favours economical products due to equivalent outcomes. Therefore, I believe that big firms should manufacture more inexpensive products to ensure equal accessibility rather than wasting funds over brand commercials.
Few inhabitants have considered that trading agencies ought to enhance the production of more durable
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
products
, whilst the rest opine that such firms should generate inexpensive
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
goods
.

Undoubtedly
, long-lasting
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
commodities
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
leave
a
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
positive
impression
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
over
the consumers;
however
, in my perspective, masses from
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
developing nations may not be able to afford exorbitant wares. These arguments need proper scrutinization
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
before
forming any opinion.

To set in, a myriad of agencies
Possible agreement error
have
launched brand
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
new
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
products
every year with the maximum longevity of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
goods
.
Besides
this, nowadays
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
companies
deal with more sophisticated
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
products
, which not
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
provide the guarantee
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
also
confer offers to complete refund on
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
products
when the consumers not
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
get
satisfied with
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
new
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
commodities
.
Even though


the
This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
sky high
prices of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
goods
, buyers find the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
new
belongings worthy due to the qualities of them.
For example
, Apple computer
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
company
attracts millions of customers each year with the productiveness and reliability of its
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
products
. Proceeding
further
, an array of citizens from
This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
poverty stricken
backgrounds are not able to afford

such expensive
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
commodities
.
Also
, the huge amount of money
is spent
by manufacturing
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
companies
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
over
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
new
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
goods
to gimmick the
Consider using "public".
general public
to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
buy
the costly
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
goods
which may

not
absolutely
be necessary for daily
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
. Despite the durability of costly
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
products
, all other functions can
efficiently
be performed
by cheaper wares and masses find them more convenient and pocket friendly.
For instance
, according to an article published by The
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
New
York Times, around 75% of inhabitants are reliable

on reasonable
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
goods
due to similar performance of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
product
with lavish one.

In conclusion
, although the durability of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
commodities
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
leaves
an imprint
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
over
the minds of
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people


with their long-term
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
yet
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
Possible spelling mistake. 'favours' is British English.
favours
economical
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
products
due to equivalent outcomes.
Therefore
, I believe that
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
big
firms should manufacture more inexpensive
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
products
to ensure equal accessibility
rather
than wasting funds
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
over
brand commercials.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay products to ensure equal accessibility rather than wasting funds over brand commercials.

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
312 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 6.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts