Both the article and the lecture talk about the mass extinction at the end of the Triassic period, 200 million years ago. The article strongly postulate three theories that bring possible explanations of this extinction. However, the lecture adamantly delineates each of them.
First and foremost, according to the author of the excerpt, falling down of sea levels near the end of Triassic period caused destroying of species' habitats that live in coastal regions and shallow waters. Consequently, food chains were changed inasmuch as such a mass extinction happened. Nevertheless, the professor in the lecture refuses this theory by stating that those species in that time was often encountered with fluctuating of sea levels, so because of that all of them adapted themselves to such a changing and following habitats' destruction. He states that nothing could bring such a demise only if a sudden event had occurred.
The professor in the lecture further maintains that effects of sulfur dioxide had to be in atmosphere long enough to decrease temperature, but it always combines with water and come back to the earth via rain. This claim refutes the writer implications of how sulfur dioxide could cause the very extinction.
The text lasting insists that an asteroid's colliding with the earth could be the source of this extinction because when asteroids hit the earth's surface, much debris will spread into the atmosphere all of which affects the amount of sunlight so that plants die and following many species starve. Nonetheless, the professor in the lecture opposes this theory by declaring that there is not any sign of crater back to Triassic period, so it cannot be a convincible theory.
Both the article and the
lecture
talk about the mass
extinction
at the
end
of the Triassic period, 200 million years ago. The article
strongly
postulate three
theories
that bring possible explanations of this
extinction
.
However
, the
lecture
adamantly
delineates each of them.
First
and foremost, according to the author of the excerpt, falling down of sea levels near the
end
of Triassic period caused destroying of species' habitats that
live
in coastal regions and shallow waters.
Consequently
, food chains were
changed
inasmuch as such a mass
extinction
happened.
Nevertheless
, the professor in the
lecture
refuses this
theory
by stating that those species in that time was
often
encountered with fluctuating of sea levels,
so
because
of that all of them adapted themselves to such a changing and following habitats' destruction. He states that nothing could bring such a demise
only
if a sudden
event
had occurred.
The professor in the
lecture
further
maintains that effects of sulfur dioxide had to be in atmosphere long
enough
to decrease temperature,
but
it always combines with water and
come
back to the earth via rain. This claim refutes the writer implications of how sulfur dioxide could cause the
very
extinction.
The text lasting insists that an asteroid's colliding with the earth could be the source of this
extinction
because
when asteroids hit the earth's surface, much debris will spread into the atmosphere all of which affects the amount of sunlight
so
that plants
die
and following
many
species starve. Nonetheless, the professor in the
lecture
opposes this
theory
by declaring that there is not any
sign
of crater back to Triassic period,
so
it cannot be a
convincible
theory
.