Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Pollution levels in London, micrograms per cubic metre

Pollution levels in London, micrograms per cubic metre 9R0r
The grah shows how the pollution level due to sulphur dioxide and smoke varied in London between 1600 and 2000. The data clearly reveals that the level of both pollutants formed a similar pattern during this period, but there were always higher levels of sulphur dioxide than smoke in the atmosphere. In 1600, pollution levels were low, but over the next hundred years, thr levels of sulphur dioxide rose to 700 micrograms per cubic metre, while the levels of smoke increased gradually to about 200 micrograms pwr cubic metre. Over the next two hundred years the levela of sulphur dioxide kept on increasing, although there was some fluctuation in tjis trend which reached a peak in 1850. Smoke levels increased a little more sharply during this time and peaked in 1900 at about 500 micrograms. During the 20th century, the levels of both pollutants fell dramatically, reporting a great deal of erratic pattern within this fall. Clearly, in London, the pollutants were a bigger problem only during the middle of the evaluation period and their presence was nil towards the beginning of the next century.
The
Possible spelling mistake found.
grah
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
shows
how the pollution
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
level
due to
Possible spelling mistake. 'sulphur' is British English.
sulphur
dioxide and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
smoke
varied in London between 1600 and 2000. The data
clearly
reveals that the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
level
of both pollutants formed a similar pattern during this period,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
there were always higher
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
levels
of
Possible spelling mistake. 'sulphur' is British English.
sulphur
dioxide than
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
smoke
in the atmosphere.

In 1600, pollution
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
levels
were low,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
over the
next
hundred years,
Possible spelling mistake found.
thr
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
levels
of
Possible spelling mistake. 'sulphur' is British English.
sulphur
dioxide rose to 700 micrograms per cubic
Possible spelling mistake. 'metre' is British English.
metre
, while the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
levels
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
smoke
increased
gradually
to about 200 micrograms
Possible spelling mistake found.
pwr
cubic
Possible spelling mistake. 'metre' is British English.
metre
. Over the
next
two hundred years the
Possible spelling mistake found.
levela
of
Possible spelling mistake. 'sulphur' is British English.
sulphur
dioxide
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
kept
on increasing, although there was
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
fluctuation in
Possible spelling mistake found.
tjis
trend which reached a peak in 1850.
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Smoke
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
levels
increased a
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
little
more
sharply
during this time and peaked in 1900 at about 500 micrograms. During the 20th century, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
levels
of both pollutants fell
dramatically
, reporting a great deal of erratic pattern within this fall.

Clearly
, in London, the pollutants were a bigger problem
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
during the middle of the evaluation period and their presence was nil towards the beginning of the
next
century.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Pollution levels in London, micrograms per cubic metre

Essay
  American English
3 paragraphs
185 words
This writing has been penalized,
text can't be
less than 250 words in Task 2
and less than 150 words in Task 1
5.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.0
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts