It is believed over-10-year-experienced people are more well-informed than newbies so organizations tend to always opt for the older employees rather than the young. From my perspective, I think there are both positive and negative sides of this notion and the choice should be flexible.
On the on hand, it is undisputed that seniors are good choice for work in some circumstances. Firstly, employees from thirties to sixties would be more suitable than the twenties in the work that requires a wide range of experience. For instance, in several companies, some important working positions such as leaders or managers are often undertaken by the people who have numerous experienced years because they have known the company very well throughout many years. Moreover, the older have more self-confidence in their decisions at work rather than the young who have little experience. In some companies, it is necessary for employees to end up decisions to solve serious problems by themselves, which is quite easy for seniors but challenging for juniors.
On the other hand, that juniors lack of experience does not means their performance at is not as proper as seniors do. Initially, it is undeniable that the younger in twenties would be more energy than the older. They have got the enthusiasm and plenty of stamina for work which rarely appear in the employees from forties to sixties but considerably contribute to develop the company. In addition, today, the youths are more and more talented and creative and update the latest global trend, which help work out new methods to solve the problems. For instance, numerous companies are now applying digitalization to their management systems which require employees to have an insight of the newest technology and creativity which employers could find from the young people.
In summary, personally, I believe that the mentioned statement has either positive or negative sides and the employers should be flexible in choosing who for work.
It
is believed
over-10-year-experienced
people
are more well-informed than newbies
so
organizations tend to always opt for the older
employees
rather
than the young. From my perspective, I
think
there are both
positive
and
negative
sides of this notion and the choice should be flexible.
On the on hand, it
is undisputed
that seniors are
good
choice for
work
in
some
circumstances.
Firstly
,
employees
from thirties to sixties would be more suitable than the twenties in the
work
that requires a wide range of experience.
For instance
, in several
companies
,
some
important
working positions such as leaders or managers are
often
undertaken by the
people
who have numerous experienced years
because
they have known the
company
very
well throughout
many
years.
Moreover
, the older have more self-confidence in their decisions at
work
rather
than the young who have
little
experience. In
some
companies
, it is necessary for
employees
to
end
up decisions to solve serious problems by themselves, which is quite easy for seniors
but
challenging for juniors.
On the other hand
, that juniors lack of experience does not
means
their performance at is not as proper as seniors do.
Initially
, it is undeniable that the younger in twenties would be more energy than the older. They have
got
the enthusiasm and
plenty
of stamina for
work
which rarely appear in the
employees
from forties to sixties
but
considerably
contribute to develop the
company
.
In addition
,
today
, the youths are more and more talented and creative and update the latest global trend, which
help
work
out new methods to solve the problems.
For instance
, numerous
companies
are
now
applying digitalization to their management systems which require
employees
to have an insight of the newest technology and creativity which employers could find from the young
people
.
In summary,
personally
, I believe that the mentioned statement has either
positive
or
negative
sides and the employers should be flexible in choosing who for
work
.