In Today's highly competitive world, poorer nations are struggling for enhancements in medical, education and trade for their development. Nevertheless, it should be better for them if richer nation's government supports such under-developing countries. I partially agree with this opinion because of some reasons.
First and foremost thing, developed nation has surpassed supply of these resources. So, sharing of them is affordable. Many rich nations doing their bit in helping poor nations. For instance, recently the American government donated around 33 billion dollars in welfare of African backward people and areas. But being dependent on rich nations for development is not good for developing nations.
Secondly, many developing nations striving hard to make improvements in these sectors like India had a literacy rate of 41% in 2000 but, according to the 2015 reports it was 78%. On the flip side, support from rich countries will make their own people feel bad and they think that the authorities are not using funds for their own progress. Recently, a campaign was introduced by England local citizens to stop funding for poor nations. So, the government has to stop such help.
Furthermore, richer nation's government should open door for foreign and for imports. Then, they can also provide scholarship to students of poor nations to study in their country's universities. So, these steps are realistic and many rich nations are following in this these nations can provide a relief for poorer nations in terms of development.
To conclude, it represents nation's social values and humanity if they take responsibility to fulfil these basic resources for poorer nations, but they also ensure that they are not making poorer nations dependent on them, this is my viewpoint on the opinion.
In
Today
's
highly
competitive world,
poorer
nations
are struggling for enhancements in medical, education and trade for their development.
Nevertheless
, it should be better for them if richer nation's
government
supports such under-
developing countries
. I
partially
agree
with this opinion
because
of
some
reasons.
First
and foremost thing, developed
nation
has surpassed supply of these resources.
So
, sharing of them is affordable.
Many
rich
nations
doing their bit in helping poor
nations
.
For instance
, recently the American
government
donated around 33 billion dollars in welfare of African backward
people
and areas.
But
being dependent on
rich
nations
for development is not
good
for developing nations.
Secondly
,
many
developing
nations
striving
hard
to
make
improvements in these sectors like India had a literacy rate of 41% in 2000
but
, according to the 2015 reports it was 78%. On the flip side, support from
rich
countries will
make
their
own
people
feel
bad and
they
think
that the authorities are not using funds for their
own
progress. Recently, a campaign
was introduced
by England local citizens to
stop
funding for poor
nations
.
So
, the
government
has to
stop
such
help
.
Furthermore
, richer nation's
government
should open door for foreign and for imports. Then, they can
also
provide scholarship to students of poor
nations
to study in their country's universities.
So
, these steps are realistic and
many
rich
nations
are following in this these
nations
can provide a relief for
poorer
nations
in terms of development.
To conclude
, it represents nation's social values and humanity if they take responsibility to fulfil these basic resources for
poorer
nations
,
but
they
also
ensure that they are not making
poorer
nations
dependent on them, this is my viewpoint on the opinion.