People sometimes imagine that prominent musicians were made by inborn skill rather than lenghty training process. While I agree that someone should have innate talent, I accept other factors including family background also considered for defining the success.
Many people would argue that improvement of the life always depend on the natural skills, due to the fact they believe if person has a instinct about certain field, it will convenient for them to grasp the subject quickly compared to their peers. Further more over the time their skill and talent will grow without much more perseverence. Although, this notion has some doubts, several top notch members of numerous fields proved it right. for instance Mozart had composed the sympony before he reached age 20 and his short life span of 32 years he played around the europe than any other composer at that time.
However sometimes persons with influential family background and huge financial assets have some advantage over others in the path of success. if someone want to climb through the ladder and become a star in their field, their family ties, school, sometimes race will have a priority over their natural ability. For example Michal Jackson was a black person when he was singing in the early eighties but he changed his skin colour to white in fact he believed it might assist him to firm establishment in white dominated music market in north america and europe.
To sum up, according to the general opinion of the society, I belive that natural skill will help someone to learn and understand about certain fields efficiently, on the contrary their family connections and other assets also play a crucial role in pathto the prosperity.
People
sometimes
imagine that prominent musicians
were made
by inborn
skill
rather
than
lenghty
training process. While I
agree
that someone should have innate talent, I accept
other
factors including
family
background
also
considered for defining the success.
Many
people
would argue that improvement of the life always depend on the natural
skills
, due to the fact they believe if person has
a
instinct about certain
field
, it
will convenient
for them to grasp the subject
quickly
compared to their peers.
Further
more over the time their
skill
and talent will grow without much more
perseverence
. Although, this notion has
some
doubts, several
top notch
members of numerous
fields
proved it right.
for
instance Mozart had composed the
sympony
before
he reached age 20 and his short life span of 32 years he played around the
europe
than any
other
composer at that time.
However
sometimes
persons with influential
family
background and huge financial assets have
some
advantage over others in the path of success.
if
someone
want
to climb through the ladder and become a star in their
field
, their
family
ties, school,
sometimes
race will have a priority over their natural ability.
For example
Michal
Jackson was a black person when he was singing in the early eighties
but
he
changed
his skin
colour
to white in fact he believed it might assist him to firm establishment in white dominated music market in
north america
and
europe
.
To sum up, according to the general opinion of the society,
I belive
that natural
skill
will
help
someone to learn and understand about certain
fields
efficiently
,
on the contrary
their
family
connections and
other
assets
also
play a crucial role in
pathto
the prosperity.