Search
Vocabularying
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

people lived a better life a hundred years ago. argue for or against the statement giving reasons and examples

people lived a better life a hundred years ago. argue for or against the statement giving reasons and examples o5kYD

Changes are inevitable; however, it could be positive or negative, one such discussion is much needed to go against the motion that states, human life was better 100 years ago. I strongly disagree with this with reasons that will be elaborated briefly in the following essay. Though, a few might say that people lived in harmony with nature a century ago, it was also noticed that they suffered with many diseases and were stuck with famines in research. For instance, my grandfather is in his early 100s and he says that he had witnessed the end of the previous century which wasn’t a joyful era. He has also stated his parents’ experience who underwent a plethora of devastating illnesses and have lost many family members due to frequent epidemics and endemics. In recent times, you are so advanced in technology and science that deaths have been brought down to a greater extent and life is fast and smooth. For example, in the UAE, they are so advanced that they create artificial rains that make their soil fertile and help in cultivation. Whereas, 100 years ago, farmers mostly depended on rain to grow crops. No rains, no harvest; thus, lives were lost from hunger and thirst. In conclusion, I would like to emphasize that numerous fields have seen tremendous growth, that in turn improved the standard of living of the present day homo-sapiens. Therefore, these are far more beneficial, and these facilities have brought positive and improved changes to our lives, than it was a hundred years ago.

This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :altersadjusts
Changes
 are inevitable; however
, it could be This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:beneficial
positive
 or This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:adverse
negative
, one such discussion is This word is normally spelled with hyphen.much-needed
much needed
 to go against the motion that states, human life was better 100 years ago. I strongly
 disagree with this with reasons that will be elaborated
briefly
 in the following essay.

Though, a Possible agreement error. The noun might seems to be uncountable; consider using: "little might".little might
few might
 say that This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualsnationsociety
people
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :resided
lived
 in harmony with nature a century ago, it was also
 noticed that they suffered with This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a plethora ofa number ofnumerous
many
 diseases and were stuck
 with famines in research. For instance
, my grandfather is in his early Use a comma before 'and' if it connects two independent clauses (unless they are closely connected and short).100s, and
100s and
 he says that he had witnessed the This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :expiration
end
 of the previous century which wasn’t a joyful era. He has also
 stated his parents’ experience who underwent a plethora of devastating illnesses and have lost This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a plethora ofa number ofnumerous
many
 family members due to frequent epidemics and endemics.

In recent times, you are This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:consequently
so
 advanced in technology and science that deaths have been brought
 down to a greater extent and life is This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:quickrapidswiftprompt
fast
 and smooth. For example
, in the UAE, they are This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:consequently
so
 advanced that they create artificial rains that This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :createconstructmanufactureproduce
make
 their soil fertile and This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :assistassistance
help
 in cultivation. Whereas, 100 years ago, farmers mostly
 depended on rain to grow crops. No rains, no harvest; thus
, This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :resides
lives
were lost
 from hunger and thirst.

In conclusion
, I would like to emphasize that numerous fields have This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :witnessed
seen
 tremendous growth, that in turn This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :ameliorated
improved
 the standard of living of the present day homo-sapiens. Therefore
, these are far more beneficial, and these facilities have brought This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:beneficial
positive
 and This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :ameliorated
improved
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :altersadjusts
changes
 to our This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :resides
lives
, than it was a hundred years ago. 