Opinion are divided, while some people propose investing finance in constructing brand-new for rapid trains connecting urban areas, other believe that ameliorating existing counterparts are much more effective. From my personal perspective, new rapid railway systems can optimize time as well as to
On the one hand, the handful of individuals contend that governments should concentrate finance on boosting railway systems owing to a combination of reasons. In the first place, as these railways have been constructed for decades, hence, they are of paramount importance in terms of connecting the districts as well as towns together. Furthermore, after being operated for years, these lines may collapse any time if even minor mistakes are taken, therefore, governments should pay attention to upgrade they infrastructure so that passengers’ safety will not be compromised. Undoubtedly, maintaining existing lines can save a large proportion of governments’ capital.
On the one hand, I contend that local authorities should prioritize expanding new railways sections. The primary rationale is it can shorten passengers’ time. As people nowadays are fulfilled by working schedules, they have tendency to opt for means of transports that can aid them to keep pace with their meetings. Moreover, the demand to commute between cities have unprecedentedly increased, plans for expansion are necessarily implemented. For example, passengers who wish to travel from Ho Chi Minh city to Hanoi have no alternative options but to opt for airplanes, however, this sort of transport has been proved to be unaffordable with the impoverished. Another compelling reasons is that the widespread railway networks can act not only as a stimulus for rural areas to prosper but also improve transactions among cities.
In conclusion, although many people reckon that upgrading existing trains network is superior with regard to monetary benefits. However, I am of the opinion that money should be invested in creating new railways lines, especially in the long-run.
Opinion
are divided
, while
some
people
propose investing finance in constructing brand-new for rapid trains connecting urban areas, other believe that ameliorating existing counterparts are much more effective. From my personal perspective, new rapid
railway
systems can optimize time
as well
as
to
On the one hand, the handful of individuals
contend
that
governments
should concentrate finance on boosting
railway
systems owing to a combination of reasons. In the
first
place, as these
railways
have
been constructed
for decades,
hence
, they are of paramount importance in terms of connecting the districts
as well
as towns together.
Furthermore
, after
being operated
for years, these lines may collapse any time if even minor mistakes
are taken
,
therefore
,
governments
should pay attention to upgrade
they infrastructure
so
that passengers’ safety will not
be compromised
.
Undoubtedly
, maintaining existing lines can save a large proportion of
governments
’ capital.
On the one hand, I contend that local authorities should prioritize expanding new
railways
sections. The primary rationale is it can shorten passengers’ time. As
people
nowadays
are fulfilled
by working schedules, they have tendency to opt for means of transports that can aid them to
keep
pace with their meetings.
Moreover
, the demand to commute between cities have
unprecedentedly
increased, plans for expansion are
necessarily
implemented.
For example
, passengers who wish to travel from
Ho Chi Minh city
to Hanoi have no alternative options
but
to opt for airplanes,
however
, this sort of transport has
been proved
to be unaffordable with the impoverished. Another compelling reasons is that the widespread
railway
networks can act not
only
as a stimulus for rural areas to prosper
but
also
improve
transactions among cities.
In conclusion
, although
many
people
reckon that upgrading existing trains network is superior with regard to monetary benefits.
However
, I am of the opinion that money should
be invested
in creating new
railways
lines,
especially
in the long-run.