In this day and age, with the rapid growth of technology, e-learning has appeared as a more convenient study environment, which also gains traction around the world. This development leads to a host of individuals opposing the traditional classroom model. Nonetheless, I totally disagree with this perspective because physical classrooms are by no means expendable.
On the one hand, I admit that virtual learning is superior to the traditional in many aspects. The primary culprit of which is its cost-efficient. Online classes are suitable for the impoverished as they do not need to cover numerous expenses that are crucial to the brick and mortar operation. Furthermore, on the individual level, e-learning also offers considerable benefits. It is widely thought that adolescents, especially those living in rural areas, are grappling with time and geographical boundaries. With the flexibility of timetables as well as its unlimited access points features, these difficulties can be tackled.
On the other hand, I completely concur with the school of thought that says that physical classrooms are of greater importance compared to the virtual environment. First, certain academic fields inextricably require physical equipment and live activities. For example, outdoor studying plays an integral role in biology because students studying plants and animals have to research certain creatures directly to acquire in-depth knowledge. Moreover, there is no denying that the traditional model can provide students with several necessary skills which e-learning cannot emulate. For instance, live discussions and competitions among peers are vital to the development of teenagers. To be more specific, they need to strive hard to keep pace with other students, which can improve their academic performances.
In conclusion, while virtual learning is beneficial in several ways, I aver that students require both learning forms to foster themselves comprehensively.
Viết cho
Aa
In this day and age, with the rapid growth of technology, e-learning has appeared as a more convenient study environment, which
also
gains traction around the world. This development leads to a host of individuals opposing the traditional classroom model. Nonetheless, I
totally
disagree with this perspective
because
physical classrooms are by no means expendable.
On the one hand, I admit that virtual learning is superior to the traditional in
many
aspects. The primary culprit of which is its cost-efficient. Online classes are suitable for the impoverished as they do not need to cover numerous expenses that are crucial to the brick and mortar operation.
Furthermore
, on the individual level, e-learning
also
offers considerable benefits. It is
widely
thought
that adolescents,
especially
those living in rural areas, are grappling with time and geographical boundaries. With the flexibility of timetables
as well
as its unlimited access points features, these difficulties can
be tackled
.
On the other hand
, I completely concur with the school of
thought
that says that physical classrooms are of greater importance compared to the virtual environment.
First
, certain academic fields
inextricably
require physical equipment and
live
activities.
For example
, outdoor studying plays an integral role in biology
because
students
studying plants and animals
have to
research certain creatures
directly
to acquire in-depth knowledge.
Moreover
, there is no denying that the traditional model can provide
students
with several necessary
skills
which e-learning cannot emulate.
For instance
,
live
discussions and competitions among peers are vital to the development of
teenagers
. To be more specific, they need to strive
hard
to
keep
pace with other
students
, which can
improve
their academic performances.
In conclusion
, while virtual learning is beneficial in several ways, I aver that
students
require both learning forms to foster themselves
comprehensively
.
Viết
cho
Aa
Funny
Love
Wow
Angry
Sad