Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

One world government is better than national government. Ads outweight disadvantages?

One world government is better than national government. Ads outweight disadvantages? Doed7
It is said that if there is only one government for the whole world, it will be better than each country has its own national leader. From my perspective, this phenomenon will be a negative development because its benefits pale in comparison with the significant drawbacks. It is understandable why some people reckon that one world government is better than the current mode of politics. There is a cited rationale advocating this idea that this can curtailed conflicts between nations with shared regulations and all countries in the world seem to be one big country that people likely live in harmony with each other. Given the fact that, when each country has its own official leader, the political methods and other fields are different compared to other nations, leading to wars. For instance, Cold War was the result of the conflict between politics of America and the Soviet Union; or the wars between Pakistan and India in 2021. Therefore, some people assert that the world can keep the peace between nations by the formulation of one world government. Nonetheless, I believe that the demerits of this development outweigh its merits due to several reasons. The first point is that cultural identity of countries will be on the brick of disappearance. Granted, if only one government leads the world, then the legislation and laws will ban residents on doing traditions and just follow on one culture. To illustrate, if an Indian government control the world, he or she will just allow people hold festivals as his country does and abolish the other ones because it will be too much to keep all of them. The second point is that there will have difficulties in managing over 8 billion people. One world government can not pay special attention to all nations, hence the social problems will be on the rise such as crime rate. In conclusion, I opine that each country should be regulated by a national government rather than a government control the world because the phenomenon given has more disadvantages than advantages.
It
is said
that if there is
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
one
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
government
for the whole
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
world
, it will be better than each
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
country
has its
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
own
national leader. From my perspective, this phenomenon will be a
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
negative
development
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
its benefits pale
in comparison
with the significant drawbacks.

It is understandable why
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
reckon that one
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
world
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
government
is better than the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
current
mode of politics. There is a cited rationale advocating this
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
idea
that this can curtailed conflicts between
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
nations
with shared regulations and all
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
countries
in the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
world
seem to be one
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
big
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
country
that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
likely
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
live
in harmony with each
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
other
.
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
Given
the fact that, when each
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
country
has its
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
own
official leader, the political methods and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
other
fields are
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
different
compared to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
other
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
nations
, leading to wars.
For instance
,
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
Cold
War was the result of the conflict between politics of America and the Soviet Union; or the wars between Pakistan and India in 2021.
Therefore
,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
assert that the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
world
can
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
keep
the peace between
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
nations
by the formulation of one
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
world
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
government
.

Nonetheless, I believe that the demerits of this development outweigh its merits due to several reasons. The
first
point is that cultural identity of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
countries
will be on the brick of disappearance. Granted, if
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
one
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
government
leads the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
world
, then the legislation and laws will ban residents on doing traditions and
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
just
follow on one culture. To illustrate, if an Indian
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
government
control the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
world
, he or she will
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
just
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
allow
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
hold festivals as his
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
country
does and abolish the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
other
ones
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
it will be too much to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
keep
all of them. The second point is that there will have difficulties in managing over 8 billion
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
. One
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
world
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
government
can not pay special attention to all
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
nations
,
hence
the social problems will be on the rise such as crime rate.

In conclusion
, I opine that each
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
country
should
be regulated
by a national
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
government
rather
than a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
government
control the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
world
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
the phenomenon
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
given
has more disadvantages than advantages.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay One world government is better than national government. Ads outweight disadvantages?

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
342 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 7.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts
  • 5band
    include the name of the patient, the problem the patient was experiencing and what treatment was suggested.
    September 24th 2021. 15: 30 Name of patient: Jonh. He has lives at 137 PVD st district 9. He had eaten the hard bitscuit and then he realized that his mandibular first incisor was fractured. He said that his gum still had had bleeding. John feels too bad, he does not want to communicate with anyone...
  • 5band
    The once upon time mythology of 7 hellhounds and secrets of power and origin
    Back to a very long time ago, many millennia ago, dogs are still wild animals. which is domesticated just in a little population by humans. Maybe it's a reason for the birth of a supernatural dog in folklore, hellhound. The expression, 'hounds of hell, ' usually refers to beast-like creatures which ...
  • 6band
    Write an essay that explain how you see yourself and how other people see you
    Humans are a special species, we are not merely hunting food and protect our group to live. Each of us has a different personality to assert ourselves. Several people are confident, ambitious. On the contrary, there’re lots of bashful people. I consider myself confident, hot-tempered, self-conscious...
  • 6band
    Globalization has had a considerable effect on the world in the last few decades.
    Globalization has had a considerable effect on the world in the last few decades. While some people believe that these effects are all positive it can also be argued that globalization is destroying the identity of many countries in the world. This is because aspects of our lives such as entertainme...
  • 5.5band
    Compare and contrast our personality
    What’s my personality? I always wondered that what my personality is and the ways how other people see me. However, a few days ago, I have learned about personality in EAL class, and they say that our personality can be influenced by our family, our friends, our environment, or our birth order. Then...
  • 5.5band
    My personality and things that affect it
    My name is Nhan, I currently living in HCM city during this quarantine. Now I’m here to introduce myself to you, about my personality and how things around me affect it. I think that people see me as an outgoing person because sometimes I'm energetic and being self-confident during some group/class...